Changes

!Normativity and Integrity of Society.<ref>{{cite web |title=Teória Práva  (Theory of Law) |author= Jozef Prusák  |url= https://www.scribd.com/doc/82176979/1/Predhovor-k-druhemu-vydaniu |accessdate=October 26, 2014 |language=Slovak}}</ref>

!Normativity and Integrity of Society.<ref>{{cite web |title=Teória Práva  (Theory of Law) |author= Jozef Prusák  |url= https://www.scribd.com/doc/82176979/1/Predhovor-k-druhemu-vydaniu |accessdate=October 26, 2014 |language=Slovak}}</ref>

|-

|-

| According to the Theory of State and Law, the set of normative requirements towards an individual in relation to other individual or group, or such requirements towards a group in relation to an individual, represents a social network of relationships between individuals, as well as groups, that can be called a '''social normativity'''. {{#tag:ref| cf. Latin: ''Est modus in rebus, sunt certi denique fines.'' (Roughly: There is a good measure in all things, or there are fixed limits beyond which and short of which right is not able to find a place) Horatius alias [[Horace]] I, 1, 106<ref>{{cite book |title=Latiské právnicke výrazy a výroky (Latin legal expressions and verdicts) |author=Karol Rebro |publisher=IuraEdition |place=Bratislava |year=1995 |page=110 |isbn=80-88715-20-2 |url=http://books.google.no/books?id=I54hPQAACAAJ&dq=Rebro+Latinsk%C3%A9+pr%C3%A1vn%C3%ADcke+v%C3%BDrazy&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VT9NVNGGII7haPyEgvAD&redir_esc=y |language=Latin, Slovak}}</ref>|group=note}} Within a group, individuals are inter-related by a set of requirements, standards, expectations, values and codes of conduct, respecting, observing and implementation of which ensures the [[integrity]] of the society, its survival, and development, and thus the integrity, survival, and development of an individual. A group (or society as a whole) cannot exist and develop without integrity, which is then secured by values and normativity. These values and norms represent glue that holds the group and society together. Normativity is a prerequisite for integrity of a group or society, and forms the way for accomplishing the needs of social life. It is a group or society that decides which values and norms are good and important for its integrity, existence and development, and, on the other hand, which ones must be kept under the control, because when practising them, they act in counter-direction and in effect disintegrate the society. The primary role of normative systems in a society is, based on its societal values, to regulate the behaviour of people in effort to maintan the society’s very existence. Without the required degree of integration, the society as a whole would be in constant danger of disintegration, collaps, or ultimately extinction. Thus, the law and normative systems integrate the society by expressing and protecting certain values and needs, without which it is not possible for society to exist, develop, or prosper.

| According to the Theory of State and Law, the set of normative requirements towards an individual in relation to other individual or group, or such requirements towards a group in relation to an individual, represents a social network of relationships between individuals, as well as groups, that can be called a '''social normativity'''.{{#tag:ref| cf. Latin: ''Est modus in rebus, sunt certi denique fines.'' (Roughly: There is a good measure in all things, or there are fixed limits beyond which and short of which right is not able to find a place) Horatius alias [[Horace]] I, 1, 106<ref>{{cite book |title=Latiské právnicke výrazy a výroky (Latin legal expressions and verdicts) |author=Karol Rebro |publisher=IuraEdition |place=Bratislava |year=1995 |page=110 |isbn=80-88715-20-2 |url=http://books.google.no/books?id=I54hPQAACAAJ&dq=Rebro+Latinsk%C3%A9+pr%C3%A1vn%C3%ADcke+v%C3%BDrazy&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VT9NVNGGII7haPyEgvAD&redir_esc=y |language=Latin, Slovak}}</ref>|group=note}} Within a group, individuals are inter-related by a set of requirements, standards, expectations, values and codes of conduct, respecting, observing and implementation of which ensures the [[integrity]] of the society, its survival, and development, and thus the integrity, survival, and development of an individual. A group (or society as a whole) cannot exist and develop without integrity, which is then secured by values and normativity. These values and norms represent glue that holds the group and society together. Normativity is a prerequisite for integrity of a group or society, and forms the way for accomplishing the needs of social life. It is a group or society that decides which values and norms are good and important for its integrity, existence and development, and, on the other hand, which ones must be kept under the control, because when practising them, they act in counter-direction and in effect disintegrate the society. The primary role of normative systems in a society is, based on its societal values, to regulate the behaviour of people in effort to maintan the society’s very existence. Without the required degree of integration, the society as a whole would be in constant danger of disintegration, collaps, or ultimately extinction. Thus, the law and normative systems integrate the society by expressing and protecting certain values and needs, without which it is not possible for society to exist, develop, or prosper.

|-

|-

|}

|}

The actual thought experiment aiming to resolve this question consists in imagining the group of people, a pattern subject of research, that would consider as normal and normative solely the [[homosexual]] behavior. If such norm would be applied onto all members of the tested group, so that all of them would be "normalized" accordingly, the society that would adopt such twisted normative approach would simply die out or depend on unnatural methods of [[reproduction]]. The result of this [[experiment]] is predictable with absolute degree of certainty beyond any doubt. Therefore, the conclusive statement inevitably must be that not only the homosexual relationships do not secure the integrity of the society, but also act in counter-direction, endanger its very existence and disintegrate it. In order to maintain the sustainability of society, they must be left devoid of legal support with respect to any form of marriage, i.e. institution arranging i.a. the sexual relationships of humans.

The actual thought experiment aiming to resolve this question consists in imagining a ''group of people'', a ''pattern'' subject of research, that would consider as ''normal'' and ''normative'' solely the [[homosexual]] behavior. If such norm would be applied onto all members of the ''tested group'', so that all of them would be ''"normalized"'' accordingly, the society that would adopt such twisted normative approach would simply ''die out'' or depend on ''unnatural methods'' of [[reproduction]]. The result of this [[experiment]] is predictable with ''absolute'' degree of certainty beyond any doubt. Same-sex relations are ''essentially'' sterile, intrinsically unfit for generation, while compatible opposite-sex relations are intrinsically generative and only ''accidentally'' infertile. There is nothing a same-sex couple could do at any time or in any way that would render their relations fertile. The opposite is true of the vast majority of compatible opposite-sex couples, who would actively have to do something to render their relations infertile.<ref name="Reilly2014">{{cite book |title=Making Gay Okay: How Rationalizing Homosexual Behavior is Changing Everything |author=Robert R. Reilly |publisher=Ignatius Press |place=San Francisco |pages=100 |isbn=978-1-58617-833-8 |url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO-JTobNH80}}</ref>{{#tag:ref|Privations such as infertility, blindness, a missing arm. leg. etc. are accidental properties, not substantial. Accidental properties, such as privastions, do not change the formal aspect of the subject. Just because a man is blind does not change the fact that he is a man, nor does it change the fact that the primary intelligible end of the eye is color and light. ... When a part fails to function properly we attempt to correct it rather than change our conceptualization of what it is altogether.<ref name="Sorba2010">{{cite web |title=The Essence of Marriage: Rational-Charitable Marriage versus Hedonistic Prideful-Marriage |author=Ryan Sorba |publisher=Conservative Author, Activist, and TV News Personality |date=30 Sep 2010 |url=http://ryansorba.blogspot.com/2010/09/essence-of-marriage.html |accessdate=14 Feb 2016}}</ref><ref name="Reilly2014"/>|group=note}} Therefore, the conclusive statement inevitably must be that not only the same-sex relationships do not secure the integrity of the society, but also act in counter-direction, endanger its very existence and disintegrate it. In order to maintain the sustainability of society, they must be left devoid of legal support with respect to any form of marriage, i.e. institution arranging i.a. the sexual relationships of humans.

==Notes==

==Notes==