Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + +
authors refuse to release their data and computer codes for public inspection
:[[Hendrik Tennekes]] wrote: 'The IPCC review process is fatally flawed....' [http://www.grassrootinstitute.org/system/old/GrassrootPerspective/HockeyStickScandal.shtml]
:[[Hendrik Tennekes]] wrote: 'The IPCC review process is fatally flawed....' [http://www.grassrootinstitute.org/system/old/GrassrootPerspective/HockeyStickScandal.shtml]
:There can be no peer review at all when authors refuse to release their data and computer codes for public inspection and attempted reconstruction of reported results by other scientists. [http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2013/04/28/the-disgraceful-episode-of-lysenkoism-brings-us-global-warming-theory/#546f631241e4]
==Limitations of peer review==
==Limitations of peer review==