Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
42 bytes added ,  22:36, February 14, 2016
link to essay (it's better than this article anyway...)
Line 11: Line 11:  
But Eddington did not fare well after that.  He strongly opposed a theory about massive [[star]]s known as [[white dwarf|white dwarves]] put forth by Indian physicist Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, but Eddington was proven wrong and Chandrasekhar later won a Nobel Prize for his work.  Eddington finally lost all credibility when he first insisted that a physical constant (the fine structure constant) measured to be close to 1/136 must precisely equal 1/136 to make the math easier, but when later measurements suggested a value closer to 1/137 Eddington insisted that it must precisely equal to 1/137 instead.  He was wrong both times.   
 
But Eddington did not fare well after that.  He strongly opposed a theory about massive [[star]]s known as [[white dwarf|white dwarves]] put forth by Indian physicist Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, but Eddington was proven wrong and Chandrasekhar later won a Nobel Prize for his work.  Eddington finally lost all credibility when he first insisted that a physical constant (the fine structure constant) measured to be close to 1/136 must precisely equal 1/136 to make the math easier, but when later measurements suggested a value closer to 1/137 Eddington insisted that it must precisely equal to 1/137 instead.  He was wrong both times.   
    +
==See also:==
 +
*[[Essay:Arthur Eddington]]
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references />
 
<references />
 
[[Category:Astronomers|Eddington, Arthur]]
 
[[Category:Astronomers|Eddington, Arthur]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023

edits

Navigation menu