Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
Conservapedia talk:Quality (view source)
Revision as of 03:00, April 21, 2007
, 03:00, April 21, 2007→I question the methodology of the study: publish the results
How were the "random" articles choosen? Random page link? If I preform the same thing, with say 20 random page links I get a WHOLE lot of rubbish, nothing approaching 50 percent "good" I think this wasn't truly random. [[User:Etaroced|Etaroced]] 21:07, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
How were the "random" articles choosen? Random page link? If I preform the same thing, with say 20 random page links I get a WHOLE lot of rubbish, nothing approaching 50 percent "good" I think this wasn't truly random. [[User:Etaroced|Etaroced]] 21:07, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
:Please publish the results of your survey. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 23:00, 20 April 2007 (EDT)