| | Eddington was a [[conscientious objector]] during [[World War I]]. He needed an important-sounding project to justify his avoidance of military service, and the eclipse expedition was perfect for him.<ref>From the ''New York Times'': "Eddington, a Quaker and conscientious objector, was concerned that wartime resentments were damaging the international scientific community. He leapt on Einstein’s relativity as a means of restoring harmony. As the historian Matthew Stanley has documented, Eddington’s superiors in London and Cambridge lobbied British government officials to let him devote his mandatory wartime service to preparing an astronomical expedition to test one of Einstein’s major predictions, that gravity could bend the path of starlight. By leading a British team to test the work of a German physicist, Eddington hoped to 'heal the wounds of war.'" [http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/08/opinion/how-politics-shaped-general-relativity.html?_r=0 David Kaiser, "How Politics Shaped General Relativity," NY Times (Nov. 6, 2015).]</ref> | | Eddington was a [[conscientious objector]] during [[World War I]]. He needed an important-sounding project to justify his avoidance of military service, and the eclipse expedition was perfect for him.<ref>From the ''New York Times'': "Eddington, a Quaker and conscientious objector, was concerned that wartime resentments were damaging the international scientific community. He leapt on Einstein’s relativity as a means of restoring harmony. As the historian Matthew Stanley has documented, Eddington’s superiors in London and Cambridge lobbied British government officials to let him devote his mandatory wartime service to preparing an astronomical expedition to test one of Einstein’s major predictions, that gravity could bend the path of starlight. By leading a British team to test the work of a German physicist, Eddington hoped to 'heal the wounds of war.'" [http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/08/opinion/how-politics-shaped-general-relativity.html?_r=0 David Kaiser, "How Politics Shaped General Relativity," NY Times (Nov. 6, 2015).]</ref> |
| − | Eddington liked publicity and probably dreamed of winning a [[Nobel Prize]], and upon his return to England declared that his observations proven the theory of relativity. That was good enough for reporters and historians, but the Nobel committee was not impressed and declined to give him an award. '''''Recent analysis of Eddington’s work revealed that he was biased in selecting his data, and that overall his data was inconclusive about the theory of relativity'''''.<ref>[http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0102462 Peter Coles (University of Nottingham, UK): ''"Einstein, Eddington and the 1919 Eclipse"''] | + | Eddington liked publicity and probably dreamed of winning a [[Nobel Prize]], and upon his return to England declared that his observations proven the theory of relativity. That was good enough for reporters and historians, but the Nobel committee was not impressed and declined to give him an award.{{fact}} '''''Recent analysis of Eddington’s work revealed that he was biased in selecting his data, and that overall his data was inconclusive about the theory of relativity'''''.<ref>[http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0102462 Peter Coles (University of Nottingham, UK): ''"Einstein, Eddington and the 1919 Eclipse"''] |