Changes

! style="font-size:120%; background:lightblue; text-align:center; padding:5px 0;" | About “new human rights”  

! style="font-size:120%; background:lightblue; text-align:center; padding:5px 0;" | About “new human rights”  

|-

|-

| style="padding:15px;" | ''[We can observe] the emergence of “new human rights” which, not being generally recognized as such, in fact stand in radical contradiction to “traditional” ethical and cultural values; and, consequently, are also in conflict with the existing domestic legislation and jurisprudence in most countries. They bespeak a “fourth generation” of human rights which, unlike the second and third generations, do not build on the first generation of “civil liberties” and complement them with social and economic entitlements, but are of a truly revolutionary nature: what was once considered a crime is to be transformed into a right, and what was once considered justice, into a human rights violation.{{#tag:ref|cf. ''"Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter."'' Isaiah 5:20 Holy Bible, New International Version^®, NIV^® Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.^® |group=note}}''

| style="padding:15px;" | ''[We can observe] the emergence of “new human rights” which, not being generally recognized as such, in fact stand in radical contradiction to “traditional” ethical and cultural values; and, consequently, are also in conflict with the existing domestic legislation and jurisprudence in most countries. They bespeak a “fourth generation” of human rights which, unlike the second and third generations, do not build on the first generation of “civil liberties” and complement them with social and economic entitlements, but are of a truly revolutionary nature: '''what was once considered a crime is to be transformed into a right''', and '''what was once considered justice, into a human rights violation'''.{{#tag:ref|cf. ''"Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter."'' Isaiah 5:20 Holy Bible, New International Version^®, NIV^® Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.^® |group=note}}''

<div style="padding-left:40px;">&mdash;Jakob Cornides<ref>{{cite web |title= Natural and  

<div style="padding-left:40px;">&mdash;Jakob Cornides<ref>{{cite web |title= Natural and  

Un-Natural Law |author=Jakob Cornides |year=2009 |publisher=INternational Law Group Organizations |url=http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=jakob_cornides |accessdate=3 September 2015}}</ref> </div>

Un-Natural Law |author=Jakob Cornides |year=2009 |publisher=INternational Law Group Organizations |url=http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=jakob_cornides |accessdate=3 September 2015}}</ref> </div>

|}

|}

In the course of few decades the radical homosexual activists have managed to adopt the terminology of human rights in order to make the way for their particular interests hence depriving the human rights of their true content.<ref name="Kuby">{{cite book

In the course of few decades the radical homosexual activists have managed to adopt the terminology of human rights<ref name="MarshallAtCNN">{{cite web |title=Sodomy is not a civil right |author=Bob Marshall |publisher=CNN |url=http://youtu.be/WwNJjPr4NP4 |quote=“Sodomy is not a civil right. It’s not the same as a civil rights movement, … sodomy is not a civil right, and there’s an effort by homosexual lobbyists to equate the two. That’s wrong. It’s a pattern of behavior.” |accessdate=20 Feb 2016}}</ref> in order to make the way for their particular interests hence depriving the human rights of their true content.<ref name="Kuby">{{cite book

|author=Gabriele Kuby

|author=Gabriele Kuby

|title=Globálna Sexuálna Revolúcia. Strata Slobody v mene Slobody. (Global Sexual Revolution. The loss of Freedom in the name of Freedom.)

|title=Globálna Sexuálna Revolúcia. Strata Slobody v mene Slobody. (Global Sexual Revolution. The loss of Freedom in the name of Freedom.)

|url=

|url=

|language=Slovak

|language=Slovak

}}</ref> LGBTI campaigners have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law given not by parliaments but created from judicial bench by means of [[judicial activism]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Gay marriage is not a 'human right': European ruling torpedoes Coalition stance |author=Steve Doughty |publisher=Associated Newspapers Ltd; Part of the Daily Mail |date=20 March 2012 |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117920/Gay-marriage-human-right-European-ruling-torpedoes-Coalition-stance.html |quote=Norman Wells, of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘For too long campaigners have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires.

}}</ref> LGBTI campaigners have been using the language of rights<ref name="Sprigg2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=BC07I01 |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their caboose to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). The |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref> in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires. In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law given not by parliaments but created from judicial bench by means of [[judicial activism]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Gay marriage is not a 'human right': European ruling torpedoes Coalition stance |author=Steve Doughty |publisher=Associated Newspapers Ltd; Part of the Daily Mail |date=20 March 2012 |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2117920/Gay-marriage-human-right-European-ruling-torpedoes-Coalition-stance.html |quote=Norman Wells, of the Family Education Trust, said: ‘For too long campaigners have been using the language of rights in an attempt to add moral force to what are nothing more than personal desires.

‘In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law.

‘In many cases they have bypassed the democratic process and succeeded in imposing their views on the rest of the population by force of law.

‘We are seeing the same principle at work in the Government’s sham of a consultation on same-sex marriage.’

‘We are seeing the same principle at work in the Government’s sham of a consultation on same-sex marriage.’