Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,205 bytes added ,  19:54, February 20, 2016
causal explanations
Line 1: Line 1:  +
{| class="infobox bordered" style="font-size:95%; width:25em;"
 +
! style="font-size:120%; background:green; text-align:center; padding:5px 0;" | Causal explanations
 +
|-
 +
| style="padding:15px;" |«''Facts are reliable, but readers of facts will inevitably and legitimately differ about causal explanations.''» 
 +
<div style="padding-left:40px;">&mdash; Henry Power<ref name="Rappaport1997">{{cite book |title=When Geologists Where Historians, 1665-1750 |author=Rhoda Rappaport |publisher=Cornell University Press |place=Ithaca and London |year=1997 |pages=62-3 |isbn=978-0801-433863 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=30U3W2kI7foC |quote=}}</ref>  </div>
 +
|}
 
'''Explanation in [[science]]''' is a description of the unknown in terms of the [[knowledge|known]].<ref name="DismantlingBB">{{cite book|author=Alex Williams, John Hartnett|title=Dismantling the Big Bang|publisher=Master Books|location=Green Forest, AR, USA|year=2005|page=128|pages=346|isbn=978-0-89051-437-5|url=http://books.google.no/books?id=FR7basoxkSwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=hartnett+dismantling+the+big+bang&hl=en&sa=X&ei=JvNwT_6nJJOP4gTP6fG_Ag&sqi=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=hartnett%20dismantling%20the%20big%20bang&f=false|quote=}}</ref> When an explanation is so supple that it can explain any behavior, it is difficult to test it [[experimental science|experimentally]], much less use it as a catalyst for [[scientific discovery]].<ref>{{cite web |author=Philip Skell |title=Why Do We Invoke Darwin?|publisher=The Scientist|date=August 29, 2005 |url=http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/16649/title/Why-Do-We-Invoke-Darwin-/|accessdate=June 13, 2013}}</ref> Explanation in science, and anywhere else, if it is to avoid an [[infinite regress]], always lead to certain things that are regarded as [[First cause|ultimate]].<ref name="LENNOX">{{cite book
 
'''Explanation in [[science]]''' is a description of the unknown in terms of the [[knowledge|known]].<ref name="DismantlingBB">{{cite book|author=Alex Williams, John Hartnett|title=Dismantling the Big Bang|publisher=Master Books|location=Green Forest, AR, USA|year=2005|page=128|pages=346|isbn=978-0-89051-437-5|url=http://books.google.no/books?id=FR7basoxkSwC&printsec=frontcover&dq=hartnett+dismantling+the+big+bang&hl=en&sa=X&ei=JvNwT_6nJJOP4gTP6fG_Ag&sqi=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=hartnett%20dismantling%20the%20big%20bang&f=false|quote=}}</ref> When an explanation is so supple that it can explain any behavior, it is difficult to test it [[experimental science|experimentally]], much less use it as a catalyst for [[scientific discovery]].<ref>{{cite web |author=Philip Skell |title=Why Do We Invoke Darwin?|publisher=The Scientist|date=August 29, 2005 |url=http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/16649/title/Why-Do-We-Invoke-Darwin-/|accessdate=June 13, 2013}}</ref> Explanation in science, and anywhere else, if it is to avoid an [[infinite regress]], always lead to certain things that are regarded as [[First cause|ultimate]].<ref name="LENNOX">{{cite book
 
|author=John C. Lennox
 
|author=John C. Lennox
Line 8: Line 14:  
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=jaV4gLt24HYC
 
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=jaV4gLt24HYC
 
|isbn=978-0-7459-5371-7
 
|isbn=978-0-7459-5371-7
−
|quote=}}</ref>
+
|quote=}}</ref> Claude Perrrault remarked that the main aim of science was to explain effects as best one could. However, as there may possibly be different causes capable of producing the same effect, it is hard to achieve agreed-upon explanation even for a single [[phenomenon]]. The French expression ''"le moins mal qu'il est possible"''{{#tag:ref|ca. The least wrong is what is possible.|group=note}}  conveying this pessimism occurs already in Claude's Perrault's 1680 ''Essais de physique''.<ref name="Rappaport1997"/>
 +
 
 +
== Notes ==
 +
<references group=note/>
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947

edits

Navigation menu