SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 171:
Line 171: + + + + + + + Line 182:
Line 189: + +
Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)
Revision as of 02:28, February 22, 2016
, 02:28, February 22, 2016Changing speed of light, and a trip to the woodshed.
:I will rethink his BradSmythe's block time in a little while (I accidently took in too much caffeine recently) though one contribution that was removed for being misleading and four talk entries do not make for a very substantial body of work to weigh against his problem edits. And regarding BradSmythe's remarks, since even I was able to spot more than one potential equivocation in the Nobel prize website statement BradSmythe quoted, I am sure someone with a lawyer's grasp of language analysis like Andy can do the same even faster. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] 04:03, 17 June 2015 (EDT)
:I will rethink his BradSmythe's block time in a little while (I accidently took in too much caffeine recently) though one contribution that was removed for being misleading and four talk entries do not make for a very substantial body of work to weigh against his problem edits. And regarding BradSmythe's remarks, since even I was able to spot more than one potential equivocation in the Nobel prize website statement BradSmythe quoted, I am sure someone with a lawyer's grasp of language analysis like Andy can do the same even faster. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] 04:03, 17 June 2015 (EDT)
::"It is the move that is actually taking place" is a very poor excuse for abusing your block rights.
::"I accidentally took in too much caffeine recently" is a very poor excuse for abusing your block rights.
::I'm sure you are aware that, as a non-admin who has been granted block rights, you are, as per the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]] an "assistant":
:::The block function has been devolved to select users who have shown an ability to be trusted. Many of the current Administrators started as one of these Assistants and this status can be considered a way to evaluate users for promotion. '''As "emergency Sysops", the authority of these users is limited to warning users of policy violations and blocking for blatant vandalism and harassment requiring an immediate response.'''
::Note that these "assistants" are being "evaluated for promotion", that is, their status is probationary.
::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:28, 21 February 2016 (EST)
== Changing the Speed of Light ==
== Changing the Speed of Light ==
:One would expect a change in the speed of light to affect electromagnetic potentials. One would '''''not''''' expect it to affect a resting mass.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:15, 20 February 2016 (EST)
:One would expect a change in the speed of light to affect electromagnetic potentials. One would '''''not''''' expect it to affect a resting mass.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:15, 20 February 2016 (EST)
::Actually, I would expect it to affect just about everything in atomic physics, to a degree that would be catastrophic for life on Earth. As you know, life is possible only because a number of physical constants are very "finely tuned" for the universe that we live in. This includes the relativistic nature of subatomic particles. If you are depending, for your notion that you can refute E=mc^2, on the idea that it wouldn't respond gracefully to a change in the speed of light, you are clinging to a very thin reed.
::There is no credible evidence that the speed of light has changed significantly, or in the present epoch. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 21:28, 21 February 2016 (EST)