Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
975 bytes added ,  19:30, March 2, 2016
reword
Line 15: Line 15:     
===Corporate Lobbies===
 
===Corporate Lobbies===
Four years ago, the [[United States Supreme Court]] suggested that corporate spending to influence federal elections would not “give rise to [[corruption]] or the appearance of corruption,” the majority wrote in the landmark [[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]] decision. According to recent analysis by the Sunlight Foundation <ref>Allison, Bill and Harkins, Sarah, [http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2014/11/17/fixed-fortunes-biggest-corporate-political-interests-spend-billions-get-trillions Fixed Fortunes: Biggest corporate political interests spend billions, get trillions], Published November 17, 2014. Accessed March 20, 2015.</ref> <blockquote>"Between 2007 and 2012, 200 of America’s most politically active corporations spent a combined $5.8 billion (with a B) on federal lobbying and campaign contributions. What they gave pales compared to what those same corporations got: $4.4 trillion (with a T) in federal business and support. Putting that in context, the $4.4 trillion total represents two-thirds of the $6.5 trillion that individual taxpayers paid into the federal treasury. Said otherwise, by spending: a paltry $6 billion to bribe the US government, or just a little more than what [[General Motors|GM]] will spend on stock buybacks alone, US corporations are getting the direct benefit of two-thirds of US taxpayers' labor! And here is the visual representation of this stunning finding: for every dollar spent on influencing politics, the nation’s most politically active corporations received $760 from the government. Which translates into an Internal Rate Of Return of, hold on to your hats folks, 75,900%!"<ref>Durden, Tyler, "[http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-16/words-greatest-investment-every-dollar-spent-influencing-us-politics-corporations-ge The Best "Democracy" Money Can Buy: For Every Dollar Spent Influencing US Politics, Corporations Get $760 Back", [[Zero Hedge]], Published March 16, 2015. Accessed March 20, 2015.</ref></blockquote>
+
Many sectors of the United States economy have organized trade associations under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code to advocate for their interests before the federal government.  Such activities are protected under the [[First Amendment]].
 +
 
 +
Historically, federal laws limited donations by corporations to the campaigns of candidates running for federal offices.  Laws limited these corporate campaign donations to avoid corruption or the appearance of corruption. The [[United States Supreme Court]] found that campaign spending was a form of speech and was protected by the First Amendment.  The Court suggested that corporate spending to influence federal elections would not “give rise to [[corruption]] or the appearance of corruption,” the majority wrote in the landmark ''[[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]'' decision. According to recent analysis by the Sunlight Foundation <ref>Allison, Bill and Harkins, Sarah, [http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2014/11/17/fixed-fortunes-biggest-corporate-political-interests-spend-billions-get-trillions Fixed Fortunes: Biggest corporate political interests spend billions, get trillions], Published November 17, 2014. Accessed March 20, 2015.</ref> <blockquote>"Between 2007 and 2012, 200 of America’s most politically active corporations spent a combined $5.8 billion (with a B) on federal lobbying and campaign contributions. What they gave pales compared to what those same corporations got: $4.4 trillion (with a T) in federal business and support. Putting that in context, the $4.4 trillion total represents two-thirds of the $6.5 trillion that individual taxpayers paid into the federal treasury. Said otherwise, by spending: a paltry $6 billion to bribe the US government, or just a little more than what [[General Motors|GM]] will spend on stock buybacks alone, US corporations are getting the direct benefit of two-thirds of US taxpayers' labor! And here is the visual representation of this stunning finding: for every dollar spent on influencing politics, the nation’s most politically active corporations received $760 from the government. Which translates into an Internal Rate Of Return of, hold on to your hats folks, 75,900%!"<ref>Durden, Tyler, "[http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-16/words-greatest-investment-every-dollar-spent-influencing-us-politics-corporations-ge The Best "Democracy" Money Can Buy: For Every Dollar Spent Influencing US Politics, Corporations Get $760 Back]", Zero Hedge, (March 16, 2015). Accessed March 20, 2015.</ref></blockquote>
 +
===Defense Industries==
 +
President Eisenhower warned in his farewell address of the dangers of the "military-industrial complex".  The allocation of the defense budget to specific projects and weapon systems can become political.  Although the different branches of the military are suppose to have the Secretary of Defense and the [[Office of Management and Budget]] decide questions of priority between competing projects, some military branches either lobby for their projects directly with Congress or have retired officers of their branch join the government relations staff of defense contractors who lobby for the projects.  In addition, the subcontracts for specific projects are spread to employers located in the Congressional district of Congressmen who are members of the relevant appropriations committees.
    
===[[Morality]]===
 
===[[Morality]]===
Line 21: Line 25:     
=== Right to Vote===
 
=== Right to Vote===
The woman [[suffragist]]s tried lobbying as well, but found their best success when they appealed to male voters at election time.   
+
The woman [[suffragist]]s tried lobbying as well, but found their best success when they appealed to male voters at election time.  Currently, lobbying focuses on redistricting reform and [[gerrymandering]].
    
=== Israel ===
 
=== Israel ===
 
The Israel Lobby refers to a coalition of Fundamentalist Protestants and major [[Jewish]] organizations. The lobby has strongly promoted American policies in the [[Middle East]] that are pro-[[Israel]].<ref>David Howard Goldberg, ''Foreign Policy and Ethnic Interest Groups: American and Canadian Jews Lobby for Israel'' (1990) [http://www.questia.com/read/27498528?title=Foreign%20Policy%20and%20Ethnic%20Interest%20Groups%3a%20American%20and%20Canadian%20Jews%20Lobby%20for%20Israel online edition]</ref>
 
The Israel Lobby refers to a coalition of Fundamentalist Protestants and major [[Jewish]] organizations. The lobby has strongly promoted American policies in the [[Middle East]] that are pro-[[Israel]].<ref>David Howard Goldberg, ''Foreign Policy and Ethnic Interest Groups: American and Canadian Jews Lobby for Israel'' (1990) [http://www.questia.com/read/27498528?title=Foreign%20Policy%20and%20Ethnic%20Interest%20Groups%3a%20American%20and%20Canadian%20Jews%20Lobby%20for%20Israel online edition]</ref>
   −
=== Second Amendment Unalienable Rights ===
+
=== Right to Bear Arms===
The [[National Rifle Association]], the [[Second Amendment Foundation]], the [[Gun Owners of America]] and the [[Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership]] lobby to protect and defend the [[Second Amendment]] [[Unalienable rights|right]] to [[self-defense]].
+
The [[National Rifle Association]], the [[Second Amendment Foundation]], the [[Gun Owners of America]], and the [[Brady Campaign]] lobby on [[Second Amendment]] and gun control issues.
    
==Scandals==
 
==Scandals==
Line 44: Line 48:  
* Thompson, Margaret S. ''The "Spider Web": Congress and Lobbying in the Age of Grant'' (1985) on 1870s
 
* Thompson, Margaret S. ''The "Spider Web": Congress and Lobbying in the Age of Grant'' (1985) on 1870s
 
* Tichenor, Daniel J.  and Richard A. Harris, “Organized Interests and American Political Development,” Political Science Quarterly 117 (Winter 2002–3): 587–612 [http://www.soc.washington.edu/users/burstein/Tichenor_Organized_Interests.pdf online]
 
* Tichenor, Daniel J.  and Richard A. Harris, “Organized Interests and American Political Development,” Political Science Quarterly 117 (Winter 2002–3): 587–612 [http://www.soc.washington.edu/users/burstein/Tichenor_Organized_Interests.pdf online]
 
+
== See also ==
 
  −
== See Also ==
  −
* [[Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission]]
   
* [[Soft money]]
 
* [[Soft money]]
   −
==External Sites==
+
==External links==
* Durden, Tyler, "[http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-03-16/words-greatest-investment-every-dollar-spent-influencing-us-politics-corporations-ge The Best "Democracy" Money Can Buy: For Every Dollar Spent Influencing US Politics, Corporations Get $760 Back", [[Zero Hedge]], Published March 16, 2015.
+
* [http://www.commoncause.org/issues/money-in-politics/ Common Cause - Money in Politics]
 
   
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
    
[[Category:Political Terms]]
 
[[Category:Political Terms]]
[[Category:Banksters]]
  −
[[Category:Finance]]
  −
[[Category:Economics]]
  −
[[Category:Corruption]]
  −
[[Category:Deceit]]
 
SkipCaptcha
3,995

edits

Navigation menu