Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: +
→Food for thought for liberals on same-sex "marriage": Good point.
If same-sex "marriage" is really as great as its supporters and the mainstream media like to make it out to be, then why does the media see fit to censor, suppress and silence any and all opposing viewpoints and criticism against it (including selectively editing and twisting the opposing views to make them and their proponents look bad)? When they see a need to resort to that, that tells me that the supporters have something to be afraid of in the opposing views. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 02:04, 8 March 2016 (EST)
If same-sex "marriage" is really as great as its supporters and the mainstream media like to make it out to be, then why does the media see fit to censor, suppress and silence any and all opposing viewpoints and criticism against it (including selectively editing and twisting the opposing views to make them and their proponents look bad)? When they see a need to resort to that, that tells me that the supporters have something to be afraid of in the opposing views. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 02:04, 8 March 2016 (EST)
:Good point. From the liberal MSM like ''The Washington Post,'' you'd never know that people like Bishop Harry Jackson even existed, much less that they had anything to say on the subject. [[User:DavidE|DavidE]] ([[User talk:DavidE|talk]]) 21:15, 11 March 2016 (EST)