Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:  
New Atheism is on its last legs and is almost dead. And with an [[Abrasiveness of Richard Dawkins|abrasive]] [[Atheism and cowardice|pantywaist]] like Dawkins and a clown like [[David Silverman]] (who resides in a religious country) being the leading spokesmen of New Atheism, I don't think things are going to turn around. I call Dawkins an abrasive pantywaist because like many [[Atheism and intolerance#Examples of intolerance from Richard Dawkins|intolerant bullies]], he will back down when "punched in the nose" (I am speaking figuratively of course).  
 
New Atheism is on its last legs and is almost dead. And with an [[Abrasiveness of Richard Dawkins|abrasive]] [[Atheism and cowardice|pantywaist]] like Dawkins and a clown like [[David Silverman]] (who resides in a religious country) being the leading spokesmen of New Atheism, I don't think things are going to turn around. I call Dawkins an abrasive pantywaist because like many [[Atheism and intolerance#Examples of intolerance from Richard Dawkins|intolerant bullies]], he will back down when "punched in the nose" (I am speaking figuratively of course).  
   −
It is rather humorous that the supposed alpha male (One of his donors called Dawkins "Darwin's Rottweiler") and bully boy Dawkins was trounced and made more docile by feminists. I always suspected that Dawkins had a glass jaw and he would be turned into a whimpering bowl of jelly when faced with enough opposition. [[William Lane Craig]] showed Dawkins to be a coward. And given the public statement of Oxford atheist [[Daniel Came]], I think even he thinks Dawkins is a coward (see: [[Atheism and cowardice]]).  
+
It is rather humorous that the supposed alpha male (One of his Dawkins' donors called him "Darwin's Rottweiler") and bully boy Dawkins was trounced and made more docile by feminists. I always suspected that Dawkins had a glass jaw and he would be turned into a whimpering bowl of jelly when faced with enough opposition. [[William Lane Craig]] showed Dawkins to be a coward. And given the public statement of Oxford atheist [[Daniel Came]], I think even he thinks Dawkins is a coward (see: [[Atheism and cowardice]]).  
    
I think movements that want to change society need both diplomats and firebrands. The atheist movement seems to have lost its most effective firebrands due to death (Christopher Hitchens) or missteps (Daawkins and [[PZ Myers]]). A lot of people within the atheist population have soured on Dawkins/Myers. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:02, 22 March 2016 (EDT)
 
I think movements that want to change society need both diplomats and firebrands. The atheist movement seems to have lost its most effective firebrands due to death (Christopher Hitchens) or missteps (Daawkins and [[PZ Myers]]). A lot of people within the atheist population have soured on Dawkins/Myers. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:02, 22 March 2016 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920

edits

Navigation menu