Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
225 bytes added ,  21:28, March 29, 2016
reply
Line 5: Line 5:  
::On the one hand we're not here to bash Wikipedia (or at least I'm not), but on the other hand we should explain why Wikipedia is not as good as people think and therefore why we exist as an alternative.  I think making pages on all or many of the admins would be over-kill, but if this one and even some others are very influential, it wouldn't hurt.
 
::On the one hand we're not here to bash Wikipedia (or at least I'm not), but on the other hand we should explain why Wikipedia is not as good as people think and therefore why we exist as an alternative.  I think making pages on all or many of the admins would be over-kill, but if this one and even some others are very influential, it wouldn't hurt.
 
:: I'm glad we can have a civilized discussion as well! I'd like to think that as conservatives and in many cases, Christians, we could maintain a higher standard that WP.  That's not to say I'm anything special, of course.  Again, thanks for your work, and keep it up! :)
 
:: I'm glad we can have a civilized discussion as well! I'd like to think that as conservatives and in many cases, Christians, we could maintain a higher standard that WP.  That's not to say I'm anything special, of course.  Again, thanks for your work, and keep it up! :)
 +
:::Many thanks. I'd be happy to keep the article and to improve it along the lines that you suggest. I have, perhaps, been too judgemental so please let me know if you feel that any of my past or future edits are too strong.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,401

edits

Navigation menu