SkipCaptcha
12,693
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 5:
Line 5: − − I am new here and still exploring my way around the landscape. This article has a section with the title, "Quotes on the Need for Tails OS due to Unconstitutional Police State Surveillance". That certainly caught my interest because I had not seen a documented direct connection between Unconstitutional surveillance and the Tails OS which is produced by the Tor Project. Instead of finding more than one quote, there was just a 1928 quote on the need for privacy. − − Could somebody please explain the argument made in this essay to me? We have terrible problems with terrorism and criminals seeking to evade United States scrutiny by using a "Darknet." Someone is advocating doing more to hinder the preservation of society, so that a private computer infrastructure can be in place just in case society crumbles. If the fall of civilization is not a guaranteed result, why not defend civilization (with privacy safeguards)? Who is the intended audience for this essay? [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 02:05, 10 February 2016 (EST)
Talk:Essay:Why Patriot Conservatives should use the Tor anonymous browser bundle (view source)
Revision as of 22:22, March 31, 2016
, 22:22, March 31, 2016Reverted edits by JDano (talk) to last revision by DavidB4
I do hope someone finds a way to stop packet tracing in TOR, but until they do, do you think it is even worth while? Sure, you make them work for it, but if they get it in the end, all you've done is made them add you the list of "Darknet" suspects.--[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 12:34, 9 February 2016 (EST)
I do hope someone finds a way to stop packet tracing in TOR, but until they do, do you think it is even worth while? Sure, you make them work for it, but if they get it in the end, all you've done is made them add you the list of "Darknet" suspects.--[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 12:34, 9 February 2016 (EST)