Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,420
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 82:
Line 82: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
User talk:TheAmericanRedoubt (view source)
Revision as of 23:43, March 31, 2016
, 23:43, March 31, 2016→Pages with an enormous amount of internal links with small amount of space between them. Pages with big see also sections: new section
:::Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:52, 7 February 2016 (EST)
:::Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:52, 7 February 2016 (EST)
== Pages with an enormous amount of internal links with small amount of space between them. Pages with big see also sections ==
I think it great that you are adding content at Conservpaedia.
Please keep these things in mind:
1. re: the article [[Vote with your feet]] and articles like this.
An internal article link to a Conservapedia article is a decision for people. Am I going to click this link or not. When you have a lot of internal links without much text between them, you are flooding people with a lot of decision at once. People don't like that.
In addition, it is unpleasing to the eye. Too much of anything on a page is not good. A Stanford study found that 50% of a web pages credibility is how it looks.
2. Keep category tags very relevant to the articles at hand. Use them where a lot of people will clearly see the connection. Avoid category tags which tangential in nature and people are not apt to use.
3. Please avoid category tag battles. A very small percentage of people use the tags. Battles over category tags don't make sense in terms of a cost/benefit ratio. The time spent arguing over them is just not worth it.
Focusing on making your content more informative, well-written and more pleasing to the eye (people do judge a book by its cover) is much more worth it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:43, 31 March 2016 (EDT)