Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,424
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + + +
User talk:TheAmericanRedoubt (view source)
Revision as of 14:58, April 1, 2016
, 14:58, April 1, 2016→re: Anthony Weiner article and also the issue of fighting between User: TheAmericanRedoubt and User: JDano: new section
== re: Anthony Weiner article and also the issue of fighting between User: TheAmericanRedoubt and User: JDano ==
TO: User: TheAmericanRedoubt and User: JDano
As far as the Anthony Weiner article, I will admit that the term "gun grabbing" is not encyclopedic. Strong advocate of gun control or similar phraseology would be more appropriate. It is not appropriate to remove all references to his policy on guns.
Second, making a big deal about his Jewish religion in the first 7 words of an article is not appropriate either. However, totally removing all references to his religion is not helpful either. While I am not a fan of Wikipedia, they typically list a politician's religious persuasion (Baptist, Presbyterian, Jewish, Muslim, atheism, etc.). I do think giving this information is helpful to readers.
User: JDano and User: TheAmericanRedoubt need to work more cooperatively.
Due to time constraints, I am asking User: Karajou and the owner of this website to referee if necessary. I sincerely hope this is not necessary. You both seem to be intelligent individuals. Please start behaving more cooperatively. I know you are both capable of doing so. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:52, 1 April 2016 (EDT)