Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 68: Line 68:     
::: OK, you're right, there were some slaves there.  But the basic point is correct:  Massachusetts disfavored slavery (neighboring Vermont was the first to ban it), while Virginia welcomed it.  I've made the appropriate change.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:14, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
 
::: OK, you're right, there were some slaves there.  But the basic point is correct:  Massachusetts disfavored slavery (neighboring Vermont was the first to ban it), while Virginia welcomed it.  I've made the appropriate change.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:14, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::Dealing in slaves, owning slaves, and being the first English colony to institutionalize it does not indicate a strong "disfavor" of the practice during the Puritan era.
 +
 +
::::How in the world could you do research on the subject of slavery in the US and be unaware that it was introduced to the English Colonies in Massachusetts? How could you study the Puritans and be unaware that they kept slaves? Did you never hear of the Salem Witch Trials and Tituba? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 15:26, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
679

edits

Navigation menu