Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback, Administrators
20,281
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24:
Line 24: + +
Category talk:Anti Second Amendment (view source)
Revision as of 13:37, April 14, 2016
, 13:37, April 14, 2016→"France": Agreed...that's not really accurate
{{clear}}
{{clear}}
I hope the above information is of assistance to your discussion. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:04, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
I hope the above information is of assistance to your discussion. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:04, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
[[User:GerryV|GerryV]] ([[User talk:GerryV|talk]]), I see your point. These countries can be anti-gun/pro-gun "control," but "anti-second amendment" seems like a bad category to put other countries in. Besides, the right to have and bear arms is only one of several rights granted in the second amendment. Even if the definition of "anti-second amendment" were stretched to say that other counties not bound by this are still against the principles of it (which I think is , that might not be accurate. Are they also against a "A well regulated militia?" Perhaps, but this is still a stretch. It seems to me they could be categorized as "anti-gun" or "gun control" but categorizing them as "Anti Second Amendment" seems a bit sloppy, unless they are actively fighting against the US' Second Amendment.--[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 09:37, 14 April 2016 (EDT)