SkipCaptcha
3,995
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: +
Category talk:Anti Second Amendment (view source)
Revision as of 14:02, April 14, 2016
, 14:02, April 14, 2016→"France": misuse of category software feature
::These countries can be anti-gun/pro-gun "control," but "anti-second amendment" seems like a bad category to put other countries in. Besides, the right to have and bear arms is only one of several rights granted in the second amendment. Even if the definition of "anti-second amendment" were stretched to say that other counties not bound by this are still against the principles of it (which I think is , that might not be accurate. Are they also against a "A well regulated militia?" Perhaps, but this is still a stretch. It seems to me they could be categorized as "anti-gun" or "gun control" but categorizing them as "Anti Second Amendment" seems a bit sloppy, unless they are actively fighting against the US' Second Amendment.--[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 09:37, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
::These countries can be anti-gun/pro-gun "control," but "anti-second amendment" seems like a bad category to put other countries in. Besides, the right to have and bear arms is only one of several rights granted in the second amendment. Even if the definition of "anti-second amendment" were stretched to say that other counties not bound by this are still against the principles of it (which I think is , that might not be accurate. Are they also against a "A well regulated militia?" Perhaps, but this is still a stretch. It seems to me they could be categorized as "anti-gun" or "gun control" but categorizing them as "Anti Second Amendment" seems a bit sloppy, unless they are actively fighting against the US' Second Amendment.--[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 09:37, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
:::"Pro Gun Control" seems to be the best fit. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:50, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
:::"Pro Gun Control" seems to be the best fit. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:50, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
::::The biggest problem with TAR's additions to Conservapedia was that he misuses categories and likes to apply easy labels to people, states and nations. The category software feature is good for helping find related articles. If you want to discuss someone's political views, consider adding a sentence or a paragraph to the text of the article. The added text can have a footnote to the source. For example, one politician may oppose abortion in all cases, while a second may want to allow abortion in the case of rape or incest, while a third may allow fetal stem cell research. Similarly with gun control, one politician may want to end all legislation, a second may want instant background checks, and a third may want to ban private ownership of machine guns. If an editor wants to take the time to research someone's views on these issues, then please take the time to write a sentence and add a footnote to the articles. National views are more difficult to categorize than individual views. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 10:02, 14 April 2016 (EDT)