Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  14:35, April 14, 2016
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
[[File:Richard Dawkins - March 2005.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|thumbnail|260px|right|The [[Oxford University]] Professor [[Daniel Came]] wrote to the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] and [[evolution]]ist [[Richard Dawkins]]:: "The absence of a debate with the foremost [[Christian apologetics|apologist]] for [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theism]] is a glaring omission on your [[Curriculum vitae|CV]] and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."<ref name="cowardice">Ross, Tim (May 14, 2011).  [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html "Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God"]. The Daily Telegraph website.  Retrieved July 25, 2014.  See ''[[Daily Telegraph]]''</ref>]]
+
[[File:Richard Dawkins - March 2005.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|thumbnail|200px|right|The [[Oxford University]] Professor [[Daniel Came]] wrote to the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] and [[evolution]]ist [[Richard Dawkins]]:: "The absence of a debate with the foremost [[Christian apologetics|apologist]] for [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theism]] is a glaring omission on your [[Curriculum vitae|CV]] and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."<ref name="cowardice">Ross, Tim (May 14, 2011).  [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html "Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God"]. The Daily Telegraph website.  Retrieved July 25, 2014.  See ''[[Daily Telegraph]]''</ref>]]
 
As far as '''[[atheism]] debates''', although [[atheism|atheists]] commonly claim there are reasonable arguments for [[atheism]], the quality of atheist debate has been quite poor from the proponents of atheism.  See: [[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]]
 
As far as '''[[atheism]] debates''', although [[atheism|atheists]] commonly claim there are reasonable arguments for [[atheism]], the quality of atheist debate has been quite poor from the proponents of atheism.  See: [[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]]
   Line 94: Line 94:     
== PZ Myers refusal to debate Vox Day ==
 
== PZ Myers refusal to debate Vox Day ==
−
[[File:PzMyers2.jpg|thumbnail|251px|right|[[PZ Myers]]
+
[[File:PzMyers2.jpg|thumbnail|201px|right|[[PZ Myers]]
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
Line 155: Line 155:     
==Frank Zindler versus Dr. William Craig debate==
 
==Frank Zindler versus Dr. William Craig debate==
−
[[File:Frank Zindler.jpg|thumbnail|220px|right|[[Frank Zindler]] ]]
+
[[File:Frank Zindler.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|[[Frank Zindler]] ]]
 
In a profile of contributors featured on an amateur evolutionist's website, the website [[TrueOrigin]] states the following regarding the debate between atheist [[Frank Zindler]] and Christian philosopher Dr. [[William Lane Craig]]:
 
In a profile of contributors featured on an amateur evolutionist's website, the website [[TrueOrigin]] states the following regarding the debate between atheist [[Frank Zindler]] and Christian philosopher Dr. [[William Lane Craig]]:
 
{{cquote|Frank Zindler
 
{{cquote|Frank Zindler
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,811

edits

Navigation menu