| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | [[File:Richard Dawkins - March 2005.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|thumbnail|260px|right|The [[Oxford University]] Professor [[Daniel Came]] wrote to the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] and [[evolution]]ist [[Richard Dawkins]]:: "The absence of a debate with the foremost [[Christian apologetics|apologist]] for [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theism]] is a glaring omission on your [[Curriculum vitae|CV]] and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."<ref name="cowardice">Ross, Tim (May 14, 2011). [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html "Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God"]. The Daily Telegraph website. Retrieved July 25, 2014. See ''[[Daily Telegraph]]''</ref>]] | + | [[File:Richard Dawkins - March 2005.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|thumbnail|200px|right|The [[Oxford University]] Professor [[Daniel Came]] wrote to the [[New Atheism|new atheist]] and [[evolution]]ist [[Richard Dawkins]]:: "The absence of a debate with the foremost [[Christian apologetics|apologist]] for [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theism]] is a glaring omission on your [[Curriculum vitae|CV]] and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."<ref name="cowardice">Ross, Tim (May 14, 2011). [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html "Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God"]. The Daily Telegraph website. Retrieved July 25, 2014. See ''[[Daily Telegraph]]''</ref>]] |
| | As far as '''[[atheism]] debates''', although [[atheism|atheists]] commonly claim there are reasonable arguments for [[atheism]], the quality of atheist debate has been quite poor from the proponents of atheism. See: [[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]] | | As far as '''[[atheism]] debates''', although [[atheism|atheists]] commonly claim there are reasonable arguments for [[atheism]], the quality of atheist debate has been quite poor from the proponents of atheism. See: [[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]] |
| | | | |
| Line 94: |
Line 94: |
| | | | |
| | == PZ Myers refusal to debate Vox Day == | | == PZ Myers refusal to debate Vox Day == |
| − | [[File:PzMyers2.jpg|thumbnail|251px|right|[[PZ Myers]] | + | [[File:PzMyers2.jpg|thumbnail|201px|right|[[PZ Myers]] |
| | <br /> | | <br /> |
| | <br /> | | <br /> |
| Line 155: |
Line 155: |
| | | | |
| | ==Frank Zindler versus Dr. William Craig debate== | | ==Frank Zindler versus Dr. William Craig debate== |
| − | [[File:Frank Zindler.jpg|thumbnail|220px|right|[[Frank Zindler]] ]] | + | [[File:Frank Zindler.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|[[Frank Zindler]] ]] |
| | In a profile of contributors featured on an amateur evolutionist's website, the website [[TrueOrigin]] states the following regarding the debate between atheist [[Frank Zindler]] and Christian philosopher Dr. [[William Lane Craig]]: | | In a profile of contributors featured on an amateur evolutionist's website, the website [[TrueOrigin]] states the following regarding the debate between atheist [[Frank Zindler]] and Christian philosopher Dr. [[William Lane Craig]]: |
| | {{cquote|Frank Zindler | | {{cquote|Frank Zindler |