Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
7,846
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 442:
Line 442: + +
→The NSDAP was a right-wing party
::As AugustO just said, their right and our right are two different things entirely, which is what I was trying to determine from the beginning. In Germany, the socialists sat on the right side, in the United States, the socialists sit on the left side--that's all there seems to be to this. Therefore, lets, remove the mention of which side of a room they sat on in the into, and explain that although they were politically aligned with our Democrat/left party, they were seated on the right side of the room and for that reason alone were refereed to as the right-wing. Sound reasonable? --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 09:03, 21 April 2016 (EDT)
::As AugustO just said, their right and our right are two different things entirely, which is what I was trying to determine from the beginning. In Germany, the socialists sat on the right side, in the United States, the socialists sit on the left side--that's all there seems to be to this. Therefore, lets, remove the mention of which side of a room they sat on in the into, and explain that although they were politically aligned with our Democrat/left party, they were seated on the right side of the room and for that reason alone were refereed to as the right-wing. Sound reasonable? --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 09:03, 21 April 2016 (EDT)
:::No, as all it would do is kowtow to SamHB, who appears determined to force a liberal revisionist viewpoint on Conservapedia in general and on this article in particular and any other that doesn't agree with his viewpoint. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 09:09, 21 April 2016 (EDT)