SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 397:
Line 397: + Line 444:
Line 445: + Line 454:
Line 456: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Please read the "25 points" from mein Kampf.
:::::For someone who claims to be "not a liberal", you're really bent and determined to force a liberal viewpoint on this website just like Wikipedia has (especially regarding how liberals view the Nazis), aren't you? There's a reason this site is called Conservapedia and not "Liberalpedia", but that's exactly what you want here.
:::::For someone who claims to be "not a liberal", you're really bent and determined to force a liberal viewpoint on this website just like Wikipedia has (especially regarding how liberals view the Nazis), aren't you? There's a reason this site is called Conservapedia and not "Liberalpedia", but that's exactly what you want here.
::::::Contributors would do well to confine their comments to the subject matter rather than their perceived biases of other contributors. People who have a bone to pick with individuals may do so on that person's user talk page. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:16, 21 April 2016 (EDT)
:::::From what I've seen happening in recent times, the Democrats have been anything ''but'' "patriotic"; the actions of alleged "president" Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Valerie Jarrett, Eric Holder, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and anyone else associated with the Democrats (along with their supporters) since the Obama regime illegally seized power in the 2008 election have proven the exact opposite, especially regarding importing illegal immigrants and potentially bringing even more Islamic terrorists to our shores while launching attacks on its own citizens.
:::::From what I've seen happening in recent times, the Democrats have been anything ''but'' "patriotic"; the actions of alleged "president" Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Valerie Jarrett, Eric Holder, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and anyone else associated with the Democrats (along with their supporters) since the Obama regime illegally seized power in the 2008 election have proven the exact opposite, especially regarding importing illegal immigrants and potentially bringing even more Islamic terrorists to our shores while launching attacks on its own citizens.
:::::"Restrictions on rights" are being clearly instigated by liberal politicians (both Democrats and establishment RINOs) who support gun control, abortion, attacks on religion and freedom of speech, same-sex "marriage" and "bathroom bills" catering to the gender-confused at the expense of the safety of women and children.
:::::"Restrictions on rights" are being clearly instigated by liberal politicians (both Democrats and establishment RINOs) who support gun control, abortion, attacks on religion and freedom of speech, same-sex "marriage" and "bathroom bills" catering to the gender-confused at the expense of the safety of women and children.
:::No, as all it would do is kowtow to SamHB, who appears determined to force a liberal revisionist viewpoint on Conservapedia in general and on this article in particular and any other that doesn't agree with his viewpoint. It's that intent which has gotten him blocked from this site numerous times in the past, so why should it be different this time? [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 09:09, 21 April 2016 (EDT)
:::No, as all it would do is kowtow to SamHB, who appears determined to force a liberal revisionist viewpoint on Conservapedia in general and on this article in particular and any other that doesn't agree with his viewpoint. It's that intent which has gotten him blocked from this site numerous times in the past, so why should it be different this time? [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 09:09, 21 April 2016 (EDT)
:::::Contributors would do well to confine their comments to the subject matter rather than their perceived biases of other contributors. People who have a bone to pick with individuals may do so on that person's user talk page. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 22:16, 21 April 2016 (EDT)
::::I don't pretend to know everything, but right and left and directions and that seems to be all. I'm used to thinking of right as conservative, and pro-freedom, while the left is more progressive and pro-restriction. However, if their left matches with our right, and their right matches with our left, we should say as much, not just say they sat on the oposite side of the room because of what we are used to.<br />
::::I don't pretend to know everything, but right and left and directions and that seems to be all. I'm used to thinking of right as conservative, and pro-freedom, while the left is more progressive and pro-restriction. However, if their left matches with our right, and their right matches with our left, we should say as much, not just say they sat on the oposite side of the room because of what we are used to.<br />
*"fascistic" will do
*"fascistic" will do
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 10:23, 21 April 2016 (EDT)
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 10:23, 21 April 2016 (EDT)
I would recommend that everyone read and ponder the 25 points of the Nazi party listed in [http://web.archive.org/web/20080410211317/http://constitutionalistnc.tripod.com/hitler-leftist/ this web page], and ask yourself whether this sounds more like Republicans or Democrats.
There is a lot in there that sounds very much like left-wing pie-in-the-sky liberalism:
*11. ''The abolition of incomes unearned by work.''
*14. ''We demand profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises.''
*15. ''We demand the extensive development of insurance for old age.'' [Shades of Obamacare!]
*20. ''The State must consider a thorough reconstruction of our national system of education .... We demand the education of gifted children of poor parents, whatever their class or occupation, at the expense of the State.'' ["No Child Left Behind"? "Common Core"? Well, yes and no. But it's interesting.]
But the historical fact is that the society that Hitler created did not live up to these ideals. Not by a long shot.
Now let's look at some things that sound more like Republicans:
*4. ''Only members of the nation may be citizens of the State. Only those of German blood, whatever be their creed, may be members of the nation. Accordingly, no Jew may be a member of the nation.'' (The "state" meant the Nazi government. The "nation" was a quasi-racial term that roughly translates as "us common folks", that is, people of German ancestry. Remember that in the 1920's People did migrate nearly as much as they do today, so one's "national ancestry" was usually a meaningful notion.) [This doesn't sound as though the Nazis were tolerant of what we now call "illegal immigrants".]
*7. ''We demand that the State shall make it its primary duty to provide a livelihood for its citizens. If it should prove impossible to feed the entire population, foreign nationals (non-citizens) must be deported from the Reich.'' [This sounds a little more like Donald Trump's position than Hillary Clinton's.]
*24. ''We demand freedom for all religious denominations in the State, provided they do not threaten its existence [and] not offend the moral feelings of the German race.'' [Prohibit things that offend moral/religious feelings of Christians? Like homosexual weddings? And wedding cakes?]
And some things that have no counterpart in contemporary American politics at all, like this:
*3. ''We demand land and territory (colonies) to feed our people and to settle our surplus population.'' [In other words, we are going to conquer other countries and kill their people.]