Changes

Furthermore, the growing acceptance of the [[diversity thesis]] and the [[dependency thesis]] has lead many people, even theists, to question the previously assumed universal nature of morality, destroying the first premise on which the argument is founded. Furthermore, recent studies from the fields of biology and sociology have suggested that common moral laws, such as a prohibition against killing members of one's own social group, have a distinct evolutionary advantage in increasing the [[inclusive fitness]] of the group, removing God and the afterlife, and again destroying the argument. These numerous flaws have lead the vast majority of theists to seek alternative arguments for [[God's existence]].

Furthermore, the growing acceptance of the [[diversity thesis]] and the [[dependency thesis]] has lead many people, even theists, to question the previously assumed universal nature of morality, destroying the first premise on which the argument is founded. Furthermore, recent studies from the fields of biology and sociology have suggested that common moral laws, such as a prohibition against killing members of one's own social group, have a distinct evolutionary advantage in increasing the [[inclusive fitness]] of the group, removing God and the afterlife, and again destroying the argument. These numerous flaws have lead the vast majority of theists to seek alternative arguments for [[God's existence]].

[[Category: Arguments for the existence of God]]

[[Category: Arguments for the existence of God]]