Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
8 bytes removed ,  04:39, April 25, 2016
Line 13: Line 13:  
==Recent Ontological Arguments==
 
==Recent Ontological Arguments==
 
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy states the following regarding recent developments in ontological arguments for the existence of God:
 
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy states the following regarding recent developments in ontological arguments for the existence of God:
{{cquote|In more recent times, [[Kurt Gödel]], [[Charles Hartshorne]], [[Norman Malcolm]] and [[Alvin Plantinga]] have all presented much-discussed ontological arguments which bear interesting connections to the earlier arguments of St. Anselm, [[Rene Descartes|Descartes]] and [[Gottfried Leibniz|Leibniz]]. Of these, the most interesting are those of Gödel and Plantinga; in these cases, however, it is unclear whether we should really say that these authors claim that the arguments are proofs of the existence of God.<ref>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ontological-arguments/</ref>}}
+
{{cquote|In more recent times, [[Kurt Gödel]], Charles Hartshorne, Norman Malcolm and [[Alvin Plantinga]] have all presented much-discussed ontological arguments which bear interesting connections to the earlier arguments of St. Anselm, [[Rene Descartes|Descartes]] and [[Gottfried Leibniz|Leibniz]]. Of these, the most interesting are those of Gödel and Plantinga; in these cases, however, it is unclear whether we should really say that these authors claim that the arguments are proofs of the existence of God.<ref>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ontological-arguments/</ref>}}
    
== Criticism ==
 
== Criticism ==
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,910

edits

Navigation menu