Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,937 bytes removed ,  23:06, May 6, 2016
Line 25: Line 25:  
== Other problems with the notion of weak atheism ==
 
== Other problems with the notion of weak atheism ==
   −
There are several other problems with the issue of weak atheism:
+
''See also:'' [[Problems with the notion of weak atheism]]
−
 
  −
'''1.''' Brain research pointing to the brain being strongly predisposed to religiosity. A article in the science magazine New Scientist went as far as saying that atheism is "psychologically impossible".  See: [[Atheism and the brain#Science journal and science magazine quotes about atheism and mental processes|Science journal and science magazine quotes about atheism and mental processes]]
  −
 
  −
'''2.'''  Prominent atheists/agnostics indicating that they repeatedly have thoughts that the world is designed/purposeful and research showing that many individuals in the general population of atheists/agnostics frequently have these thoughts also (See: [[Atheism and purpose]]).
  −
 
  −
'''3.''' [[Christian apologetics]] is the defense of the Christian faith through logic/evidence based arguments. .  In recent years there has been a renaissance and proliferation of compelling material addressing the worldview of atheism (see: [[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]]).
  −
 
  −
[[File:John Lennox.jpg|right|thumb|200px|[[John Lennox]] ]]
  −
In June of 2012, the UK based Dorsett [[Secular Humanism|Humanists]] wrote:
  −
{{Cquote|There’s been a forceful backlash against the ‘[[New Atheism|new atheism]]’ of writers like [[Richard Dawkins]] and the late [[Christopher Hitchens]], inspiring a new wave of Christian apologists. This group includes: [[Alister McGrath]], Professor of Theology at King’s College London, Keith Ward, former Professor of Divinity at Oxford, and [[John Lennox]], Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford.
  −
 
  −
Many atheists make the mistake of assuming religion is wholly irrational, relying on faith alone but, in a series of interviews recorded for DVD, the apologetics heavyweights from the list above demonstrate their ability to challenge us with reasoned arguments.<ref>[http://dorset-humanists1.blogspot.com/2012/06/philosophy-science-and-god-debate.html Philosophy, Science and the God Debate]</ref>}}
      
== Weak atheism and intelligence ==
 
== Weak atheism and intelligence ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,729

edits

Navigation menu