Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback
20,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + +
→Link to redirects?: new section
==Style==
==Style==
I have an opinion question--how should I style this content? There are enough file extensions to fill an entire page with one letter's worth only, but right now the tables are small. If I do not merge them, Each table ends up a different size. Is there a way to force column size? Any other thoughts? Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 10:02, 17 May 2016 (EDT)
I have an opinion question--how should I style this content? There are enough file extensions to fill an entire page with one letter's worth only, but right now the tables are small. If I do not merge them, Each table ends up a different size. Is there a way to force column size? Any other thoughts? Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 10:02, 17 May 2016 (EDT)
== Link to redirects? ==
As some of you may be aware, I have created some redirects so that someone can search for a file extension and end up on a page talking about that kind of file. If I spend a lot of time working on it, or someone else adds content as well, these may become real pages, or they may be changed to redirect to more specific pages. For that reason, I feel that when applicable, it would be better to link to the redirects. However, this is spoken against at least [[Conservapedia:How_to_create_and_maintain_high-quality_articles|here]], if nowhere else. Should I refrain, or is it okay to do it in this case? --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 10:12, 17 May 2016 (EDT)