60
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 363:
Line 363: + + + +
→"Hillary": new section
And remember, User's are taking a huge risk simply posting to a talk page, with a one-in-ten possibility they will be summarily executed for ''wanting'' to work together. [[User:RobSmith|RobS aka Nobs01]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Enter if you Dare! 90/10 Awaits: Beware!]]</sup> 13:23, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
And remember, User's are taking a huge risk simply posting to a talk page, with a one-in-ten possibility they will be summarily executed for ''wanting'' to work together. [[User:RobSmith|RobS aka Nobs01]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Enter if you Dare! 90/10 Awaits: Beware!]]</sup> 13:23, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
:I am not going to engage in pointless bickering with you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:35, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
:I am not going to engage in pointless bickering with you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:35, 22 May 2016 (EDT)
== "Hillary" ==
I did not realize that Conservapedia was on a first-name basis with Secretary Clinton. Why does her article insist on the informal address when no other article on an individual person on the site does? [[User:GerryV|GerryV]] ([[User talk:GerryV|talk]]) 00:54, 26 May 2016 (EDT)