Changes

I reverted back the edits that deleted the detailed description of how Conservapedia was censored by Wikipedia. Illustrating the mindset of the editors in control of Wikipedia is informative and interesting. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:11, 29 January 2007 (EST)

I reverted back the edits that deleted the detailed description of how Conservapedia was censored by Wikipedia. Illustrating the mindset of the editors in control of Wikipedia is informative and interesting. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:11, 29 January 2007 (EST)

'''Reply:''' Unfortunately this example ''does not'' illustrate the mindset of Wikipedia editors. I shows that conservapedia is shallow-- citing the strange username of an editor as evidence of their bias; is there an inherent liberal bias in the use of a pen-name? Arguments such as this are diluting the good arguments against wikipedia and killing conservapedia's credibility.  

'''Reply:''' Unfortunately this example ''does not'' illustrate the mindset of Wikipedia editors. It shows that conservapedia is shallow-- citing the strange username of an editor as evidence of their bias; is there an inherent liberal bias in the use of a pen-name? Arguments such as this are diluting the good arguments against wikipedia and killing conservapedia's credibility.  

--[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 15:58, 29 January 2007 (EST)

--[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 15:58, 29 January 2007 (EST)

*Isn't "Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington" a literary reference? P. G. Wodehouse? Saki? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:32, 29 January 2007 (EST) Not quite, it's J. K. Rowling... he's in the Harry Potter novels. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:34, 29 January 2007 (EST)

*Isn't "Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington" a literary reference? P. G. Wodehouse? Saki? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:32, 29 January 2007 (EST) Not quite, it's J. K. Rowling... he's in the Harry Potter novels. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:34, 29 January 2007 (EST)