Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 142:
Line 142: + +
→Toward avoiding double standards: Terry is right
I suggest that the article address OT and NT law on the subject, in addition to citing legal precedents in American and British family law.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 18:48, 22 April 2007 (EDT)
I suggest that the article address OT and NT law on the subject, in addition to citing legal precedents in American and British family law.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 18:48, 22 April 2007 (EDT)
:At the risk of fomenting sectarian strife, I will second this. Unless Mr. Schlafly has a strong objection, this information should be incorporated - particularly the definition provided by the Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:52, 22 April 2007 (EDT)