1,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 168:
Line 168: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 22:52, January 29, 2007
, 22:52, January 29, 2007no edit summary
::: '''REPLY''' But "Gothmog" does not exercise super-user privileges here and censor entire entries.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:06, 29 January 2007 (EST)
::: '''REPLY''' But "Gothmog" does not exercise super-user privileges here and censor entire entries.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:06, 29 January 2007 (EST)
::: '''Reply''' The name of a user does not matter. Just because one of Wikipedia's editors happens to be a fan of the ''Harry Potter'' Book Series does not mean that he has some kind of bias. I think that you are just upset that the article on Conservapedia got deleted. (the merits of its deletion are debatable) The name of the editor is meaningless. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 17:34, 29 January 2007 (EST)
::: '''Reply''' The name of a user does not matter. Just because one of Wikipedia's editors happens to be a fan of the ''Harry Potter'' Book Series does not mean that he has some kind of bias. I think that you are just upset that the article on Conservapedia got deleted. (the merits of its deletion are debatable) The name of the editor is meaningless. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 17:34, 29 January 2007 (EST)
Keep the thing up... it's perfectly acceptable. Who cares if people think we're shallow? [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 17:52, 29 January 2007 (EST)