Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 00:25, January 30, 2007

577 bytes added ,  00:25, January 30, 2007
→‎Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington
Line 181: Line 181:     
Alot of the sections on this page are not really examples of bias.  maybe the page should be split int 2 pages, one for examples of bias, and one for other reasons not to use Wikipedia. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 18:28, 29 January 2007 (EST)
 
Alot of the sections on this page are not really examples of bias.  maybe the page should be split int 2 pages, one for examples of bias, and one for other reasons not to use Wikipedia. --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 18:28, 29 January 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
'''REPLY''' The reader can be the judge of bias.  Personally, and I'm sure many would agree with me, I feel that someone who names himself after a character in a children's book (a book to which many Christians object, by the way), '''and''' also calls himself "Nearly Headless Nick", is not likely to be an informed, fair judge of someone else's work.  Of course you're free to disagree with my conclusion, but censoring this information so that others would be unable to draw their own conclusions is unjustified. --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:25, 29 January 2007 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/12234"

Navigation menu