Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
366 bytes added ,  15:56, June 4, 2016
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
It's funny to read Dilma Rousseff labeled "Marxist", since in the 13 years of her party's misgovernment the only ones who profited were the dozen or so of the most rich people in Brazil. If "left" is governing for the people and "right" for the rich (which it isn't, but that's how leftists think about themselves), then Dilma and Lula were extreme-extreme-extreme-right. [[User:Sunda62|Sunda62]] ([[User talk:Sunda62|talk]]) 11:25, 14 May 2016 (EDT)
 
It's funny to read Dilma Rousseff labeled "Marxist", since in the 13 years of her party's misgovernment the only ones who profited were the dozen or so of the most rich people in Brazil. If "left" is governing for the people and "right" for the rich (which it isn't, but that's how leftists think about themselves), then Dilma and Lula were extreme-extreme-extreme-right. [[User:Sunda62|Sunda62]] ([[User talk:Sunda62|talk]]) 11:25, 14 May 2016 (EDT)
 +
 +
:But this is the argument that the left uses to say they have no blame of the shit that PT did in Brazil: say the party is on the right because governed for the rich, which the left has always done since born. All that Dilma did makes she's more Marxist and fascist.--[[User:Renan Jackson|Renan Jackson]] ([[User talk:Renan Jackson|talk]]) 11:56, 4 June 2016 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
271

edits

Navigation menu