100
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + +
Debate:Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism? (view source)
Revision as of 09:55, April 23, 2007
, 09:55, April 23, 2007→no
:: I think what motivates Al Qaeda is its success in striking American targets without fear of reprisal. e.g. '93 WTC, '98 African Embassy's, '00 USS Cole, '01 9/11. --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 11:48, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
:: I think what motivates Al Qaeda is its success in striking American targets without fear of reprisal. e.g. '93 WTC, '98 African Embassy's, '00 USS Cole, '01 9/11. --[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 11:48, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
To say that global warming is less of a threat then terrorism is to show a blatant misunderstanding of both subjects. Terrorism has killed a couple of thousand people since 9/11. Now, that is a couple of thousand too many, however the amount that could die from the very real threat of global warming is up there in the millions scale. At the same time, the best way to treat terrorism is the same way you would treat a kid at the beach who kicks over your sandcastle. Pretend to ignore it, while using assasinations, guerilla forces, SAS, CIA, whatever you want to call it. Big wars achieve nothing and they never have. Look at the crusades. Look at the Japanese in WW2. Its a very simple equation, war does not equal success. [[Bolly Ottihw|Bolly Ottihw]] 19:55, 23 April 2007
==yes==
==yes==