Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎This article is a travesty: What misinformation?
Line 125: Line 125:  
::[[User:JC|JC]] 17:19, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::[[User:JC|JC]] 17:19, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Equal footing does ''not'' mean 'supreme above all other views'. Nor does it mean 'allowing misinformation to stand as fact'.--[[User:M|M]] 07:27, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Equal footing does ''not'' mean 'supreme above all other views'. Nor does it mean 'allowing misinformation to stand as fact'.--[[User:M|M]] 07:27, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
::::You're a bit slow responding to ''that'' comment!  What misinformation is in the article?  If I agree, I will remove/modify/clarify it.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:32, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:::The current article clearly denigrates evolution below the place it enjoys in the scientific canons, based on inane arguments that don't deserve to be placed here.  --[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 17:25, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::The current article clearly denigrates evolution below the place it enjoys in the scientific canons, based on inane arguments that don't deserve to be placed here.  --[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 17:25, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Sorry if my failure at understanding sarcasm insulted you, Cracker!!!  Not my intent!!  I was just confused...--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 17:28, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Sorry if my failure at understanding sarcasm insulted you, Cracker!!!  Not my intent!!  I was just confused...--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 17:28, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu