447
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 36:
Line 36: + + + + + +
Debate:Who feels that scientific related articles should only reference published research papers instead of websites when dealing with research instead of application? (view source)
Revision as of 14:05, April 23, 2007
, 14:05, April 23, 2007no edit summary
Perhaps just the structure for science articles should be used, that way we could distinguish the difference between science articles and philosophical POV articles?--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 09:50, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
Perhaps just the structure for science articles should be used, that way we could distinguish the difference between science articles and philosophical POV articles?--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 09:50, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
Yes, not sure everyone hear knows how to write a solid scientific article though.
Maybe there should be a new commandment, or a guide on how to structure scientific articles, with an example on how to, and how NOT to go about it?
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]
== No ==
== No ==