Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Statement of fact: Spell Check, typos fixed: Therefore → Therefore,
Line 16: Line 16:  
# The "individual mandate" is a capitation tax, in violation of I.9.4.<ref name=captax>{{cite web|last=Hurlbut|first=Terry|authorlink=User:TerryH|url=http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/hcr-mandate-capitation-tax-or-bill-of-attainder|title=HCR mandate: capitation tax or bill of attainder?|publisher=Essex County Conservative Examiner|date=2010-10-16|accessmonthday=January 9|accessyear=2011}}</ref>
 
# The "individual mandate" is a capitation tax, in violation of I.9.4.<ref name=captax>{{cite web|last=Hurlbut|first=Terry|authorlink=User:TerryH|url=http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/hcr-mandate-capitation-tax-or-bill-of-attainder|title=HCR mandate: capitation tax or bill of attainder?|publisher=Essex County Conservative Examiner|date=2010-10-16|accessmonthday=January 9|accessyear=2011}}</ref>
 
# The taxes on various medical devices constitute taxes and duties on State exports, in violation of I.9.5.<ref name=stateexptax>{{cite web|last=Hurlbut|first=Terry|authorlink=User:TerryH|url=http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/hcr-medical-device-taxes-unconstitutional-say-nj-plaintiffs|title=HCR medical-device taxes unconstitutional, say NJ plaintiffs|publisher=Essex County Conservative Examiner|date=2010-10-16|accessmonthday=January 9|accessyear=2011}}</ref>
 
# The taxes on various medical devices constitute taxes and duties on State exports, in violation of I.9.5.<ref name=stateexptax>{{cite web|last=Hurlbut|first=Terry|authorlink=User:TerryH|url=http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/hcr-medical-device-taxes-unconstitutional-say-nj-plaintiffs|title=HCR medical-device taxes unconstitutional, say NJ plaintiffs|publisher=Essex County Conservative Examiner|date=2010-10-16|accessmonthday=January 9|accessyear=2011}}</ref>
−
# [[President of the United States|President]] [[Barack Obama]] was not legally qualified to sign the legislation, because he is in fact not a [[natural-born citizen]] within the actual meaning of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. Therefore every signing that the President has done, including the signing of this Act, is ''ultra vires.''<ref name=natborncit>{{cite web|last=Hurlbut|first=Terry|authorlink=User:TerryH|url=http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/novel-eligibility-challenge-nj-anti-hcr-suit|title=Novel eligibility challenge in NJ anti-HCR suit|publisher=Essex County Conservative Examiner|date=2010-10-20|accessmonthday=January 9|accessyear=2011}}</ref><ref name=renounced>{{cite web|last=Hurlbut|first=Terry|authorlink=User:TerryH|url=http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/obama-renounced-citizenship-and-eligibility-say-nj-anti-hcr-plaintiffs|title=Obama renounced citizenship and eligibility, say NJ anti-HCR plaintiffs|publisher=Essex County Conservative Examiner|date=2010-10-20|accessmonthday=January 9|accessyear=2011}}</ref>
+
# [[President of the United States|President]] [[Barack Obama]] was not legally qualified to sign the legislation, because he is in fact not a [[natural-born citizen]] within the actual meaning of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. Therefore, every signing that the President has done, including the signing of this Act, is ''ultra vires.''<ref name=natborncit>{{cite web|last=Hurlbut|first=Terry|authorlink=User:TerryH|url=http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/novel-eligibility-challenge-nj-anti-hcr-suit|title=Novel eligibility challenge in NJ anti-HCR suit|publisher=Essex County Conservative Examiner|date=2010-10-20|accessmonthday=January 9|accessyear=2011}}</ref><ref name=renounced>{{cite web|last=Hurlbut|first=Terry|authorlink=User:TerryH|url=http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/obama-renounced-citizenship-and-eligibility-say-nj-anti-hcr-plaintiffs|title=Obama renounced citizenship and eligibility, say NJ anti-HCR plaintiffs|publisher=Essex County Conservative Examiner|date=2010-10-20|accessmonthday=January 9|accessyear=2011}}</ref>
 
# The Act double-taxes some forms of income, and taxes other forms of income that do not in fact exist. This exceeds the authority of the [[United States Congress]] under the [[Sixteenth Amendment]].<ref name=dbltax>{{cite web|last=Hurlbut|first=Terry|authorlink=User:TerryH|url=http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/nj-plaintiffs-hcr-exceeds-16th-amendment|title=NJ plaintiffs: HCR exceeds 16th amendment|publisher=Essex County Conservative Examiner|date=2010-10-21|accessmonthday=January 9|accessyear=2011}}</ref>
 
# The Act double-taxes some forms of income, and taxes other forms of income that do not in fact exist. This exceeds the authority of the [[United States Congress]] under the [[Sixteenth Amendment]].<ref name=dbltax>{{cite web|last=Hurlbut|first=Terry|authorlink=User:TerryH|url=http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/nj-plaintiffs-hcr-exceeds-16th-amendment|title=NJ plaintiffs: HCR exceeds 16th amendment|publisher=Essex County Conservative Examiner|date=2010-10-21|accessmonthday=January 9|accessyear=2011}}</ref>
 
# The Act subjects patient medical records subject to unreasonable and warrantless search and seizure, in violation of the [[Fourth Amendment]].<ref name=srchseize>{{cite web|last=Hurlbut|first=Terry|authorlink=User:TerryH|url=http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/nj-plaintiffs-warn-of-warrantless-search-and-seizure-of-medical-records|title=NJ plaintiffs warn of warrantless search and seizure of medical records|publisher=Essex County Conservative Examiner|date=2010-10-24|accessmonthday=January 9|accessyear=2011}}</ref>
 
# The Act subjects patient medical records subject to unreasonable and warrantless search and seizure, in violation of the [[Fourth Amendment]].<ref name=srchseize>{{cite web|last=Hurlbut|first=Terry|authorlink=User:TerryH|url=http://www.examiner.com/essex-county-conservative-in-newark/nj-plaintiffs-warn-of-warrantless-search-and-seizure-of-medical-records|title=NJ plaintiffs warn of warrantless search and seizure of medical records|publisher=Essex County Conservative Examiner|date=2010-10-24|accessmonthday=January 9|accessyear=2011}}</ref>
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,376

edits

Navigation menu