Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: − + − + − +
→top: clean up
For example, in ''School Union No. 37 v. Ms. C.'' (1st Cir. 2008), a case arising from [[Maine]], the court dismissed an action by a parent and student based on '''laches''' because they did not seek reimbursement for school room, board and transportation expenses until after the student had completed high school. The court found the delay to be unreasonable and that it prejudiced the school because it would then have a more difficult time explaining its role and the student's needs for special education.
For example, in ''School Union No. 37 v. Ms. C.'' (1st Cir. 2008), a case arising from [[Maine]], the court dismissed an action by a parent and student based on '''laches''' because they did not seek reimbursement for school room, board and transportation expenses until after the student had completed high school. The court found the delay to be unreasonable and that it prejudiced the school because it would then have a more difficult time explaining its role and the student's needs for special education.
[[category:education]]
[[Category:Education]]
[[category:Circuit Cases]]
[[Category:Circuit Cases]]
[[category:First Circuit]]
[[Category:First Circuit]]