Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,376
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: − + − +
→top: clean up
Rooker-Feldman also "does not prohibit federal district courts from exercising jurisdiction where the plaintiff's claim is merely a general challenge to the constitutionality of the state law applied in the state action, rather than a challenge to the law's application in a particular state case." ''Hood v. Keller'', 341 F.3d 593, 597 (6th Cir. 2003) (internal quotations omitted).
Rooker-Feldman also "does not prohibit federal district courts from exercising jurisdiction where the plaintiff's claim is merely a general challenge to the constitutionality of the state law applied in the state action, rather than a challenge to the law's application in a particular state case." ''Hood v. Keller'', 341 F.3d 593, 597 (6th Cir. 2003) (internal quotations omitted).
[[category:law]]
[[Category:Law]]
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]