Changes

::2. I'm sorry that I've seemed to confuse you. Please allow me to explain my interpretation of the conservative position on the education of sex and the education of religion.  

::2. I'm sorry that I've seemed to confuse you. Please allow me to explain my interpretation of the conservative position on the education of sex and the education of religion.  

:::* One should teach children family values, morals and religion at an early age. This is for their benefit and for the benefit of mankind. (As an adult they can do whatever they would like to do, provided they don't break the law.)  

:::* One should teach children family values, morals and religion at an early age. This is for the child's benefit and for the benefit of mankind. (As an adult they can do whatever they would like to do, provided they don't break the law.)  

:::* Regarding sex, the conservative position is that it is desirable to prolong the child's innocence by postponing sex education as long as possible.  

:::* Regarding sex, the conservative position is that it is desirable to prolong the child's innocence by postponing sex education as long as possible.  

::I'm sorry if this flavor of common sense offends you. Furthermore, I'm sorry but I can't begin to understand why this common sense would support in any way the ridiculous notion that "religion is morally wrong" by ''any'' definition of "religion" as posted below by another editor. As best as I can figure from the poorly written, badly punctuated and misspelled statements above here's what I suppose the liberal position is:

::I'm sorry if this flavor of common sense offends you. Furthermore, I'm sorry but I can't begin to understand why this common sense would support in any way the ridiculous notion that "religion is morally wrong" by ''any'' definition of "religion" as posted below by another editor. As best as I can figure from the poorly written, badly punctuated and misspelled statements above here's what I suppose the liberal position is: