| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Obamanomics''' is a term describing the school of economic thought and policy being pushed by the [[Obama Administration]]. Its main doctrine is massive government spending (as evidenced by the [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009]]) in excess of $1 trillion, which is funded by massive borrowing through U.S. Treasury bonds<ref>[http://www.amherstwire.com/2009/03/06/faq-obamas-economic-stimulus-package/ ''Amherstwire.com'': "FAQ: Obama's Economic Stimulus Package"]</ref>. With unemployment at 10.2% as of October 2009<ref>[http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/jobs_lost/2009/11/06/282644.html ''Newsmax'': "U.S. Jobless Rate Hits 10.2%; 190,000 Jobs Lost"]</ref> and the value of the U.S. dollar plummeting<ref>[http://www.cbc.ca/fp/story/2009/11/09/2202568.html "Gold, Loonie Soars on Plunging Greenback CBC News]</ref>, it has proven to be a failed system. | + | '''Obamanomics''' is a term describing the school of economic thought and policy being pushed by the [[Obama Administration]]. Its main doctrine is massive government spending (as evidenced by the [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009]]) in excess of $1 trillion, which is funded by massive borrowing through U.S. Treasury bonds.<ref>[http://www.amherstwire.com/2009/03/06/faq-obamas-economic-stimulus-package/ ''Amherstwire.com'': "FAQ: Obama's Economic Stimulus Package"]</ref> With unemployment at 10.2% as of October 2009<ref>[http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/jobs_lost/2009/11/06/282644.html ''Newsmax'': "U.S. Jobless Rate Hits 10.2%; 190,000 Jobs Lost"]</ref> and the value of the U.S. dollar plummeting,<ref>[http://www.cbc.ca/fp/story/2009/11/09/2202568.html "Gold, Loonie Soars on Plunging Greenback CBC News]</ref> it has proven to be a failed system. |
| | [[File:G.D.P. Q2 2010.JPG|175px|right|thumb|Obamanomics did not produce 1% growth in its first year, and growth turned down significantly 9 months into recovery.]] | | [[File:G.D.P. Q2 2010.JPG|175px|right|thumb|Obamanomics did not produce 1% growth in its first year, and growth turned down significantly 9 months into recovery.]] |
| | | | |
| − | Through three fiscal years, the federal government takes in $6 billion a day and spends $10 billion a day. <ref>[http://nation.foxnews.com/president-obama/2012/01/02/every-day-obama-regime-takes-6-billion-and-spends-10-billion Every Day, the Obama Regime Takes in $6 Billion and Spends $10 Billion, Fox Nation, January 02, 2012]</ref> One outcome of Obamanomics has been to saddle America with debt and no positive benefits can be attributed to the gobs of money spent. | + | Through three fiscal years, the federal government takes in $6 billion a day and spends $10 billion a day.<ref>[http://nation.foxnews.com/president-obama/2012/01/02/every-day-obama-regime-takes-6-billion-and-spends-10-billion Every Day, the Obama Regime Takes in $6 Billion and Spends $10 Billion, Fox Nation, January 02, 2012]</ref> One outcome of Obamanomics has been to saddle America with debt and no positive benefits can be attributed to the gobs of money spent. |
| | | | |
| − | Nevertheless, budgets passed under President Obama have included the smallest average annualized growth of federal spending (1.4%) since before President Reagan. Federal spending grew an average of 8.7% per year during Reagan's first term and an average of 8.1% per year during George W. Bush's second term.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/|title=Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama?|publisher=Forbes|author=Rick Ungar|date=May 24th, 2012}}</ref> | + | Nevertheless, budgets passed under President Obama have included the smallest average annualized growth of federal spending (1.4%) since before President Reagan. Federal spending grew an average of 8.7% per year during Reagan's first term and an average of 8.1% per year during George W. Bush's second term.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/|title=Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama?|publisher=Forbes|author=Rick Ungar|date=May 24, 2012}}</ref> |
| | | | |
| | ==Key Components of Obamanomics== | | ==Key Components of Obamanomics== |
| Line 24: |
Line 24: |
| | [[File:Obama tax increases.JPG|right|275px]] | | [[File:Obama tax increases.JPG|right|275px]] |
| | On September 12, 2008 while campaigning in [[Dover]], [[New Hampshire]], then [[Barack Hussein Obama 2008 Presidential campaign|candidate Obama]] made this solemn promise to the American people: | | On September 12, 2008 while campaigning in [[Dover]], [[New Hampshire]], then [[Barack Hussein Obama 2008 Presidential campaign|candidate Obama]] made this solemn promise to the American people: |
| − | :''I can make a firm pledge: under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 will see their taxes increase - not your income taxes, not your payroll taxes.'' <ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8erePM8V5 Video]</ref><ref>[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/obamas_remarks_in_dover_new_ha.html Transcript]</ref><br> | + | :''I can make a firm pledge: under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 will see their taxes increase - not your income taxes, not your payroll taxes.'' <ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8erePM8V5 Video]</ref><ref>[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/obamas_remarks_in_dover_new_ha.html Transcript]</ref> |
| | | | |
| | As of January 1, 2011, income taxes and payroll taxes are slated to increase on all working people in the [[United States]], including the poor and those least able to afford it. A working family with four children, for example, will pay $215 more ''per month'' under [[President Obama]] and the Congressional Democrats economic program. | | As of January 1, 2011, income taxes and payroll taxes are slated to increase on all working people in the [[United States]], including the poor and those least able to afford it. A working family with four children, for example, will pay $215 more ''per month'' under [[President Obama]] and the Congressional Democrats economic program. |