Changes

== The pro-evolution magazine the Scientific American on bestiality ==

== The pro-evolution magazine the Scientific American on bestiality ==

See also: [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]] and [[Theory of Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Irreligion and superstition]]

See also: [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]] and [[Theory of Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Irreligion and superstition]]

[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. The pro-[[evolution]] magazine the ''Scientific American'' speciously made this unwarranted speculation via their blog on the aberrant practice of [[bestiality]]:

[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. The pro-[[evolution]] magazine the ''Scientific American'' speciously made this unwarranted speculation via their blog on the aberrant practice of [[bestiality]]:

{{cquote|After all, we are animals....

{{cquote|After all, we are animals....

In any event, philosophical questions aside, I simply find it astounding — and incredibly fascinating from an [[evolution|evolutionary]] perspective — that so many people (as much as a full percent of the general population) are certifiable zoophiles. And scientific researchers appear to be slowly conceding that zoophilia may be a genuine human sexual orientation.<ref>Animal Lovers: Zoophiles Make Scientists Rethink Human Sexuality By Jesse Bering, March 24, 2010</ref>}}

In any event, philosophical questions aside, I simply find it astounding — and incredibly fascinating from an [[evolution]]ary perspective — that so many people (as much as a full percent of the general population) are certifiable zoophiles. And scientific researchers appear to be slowly conceding that zoophilia may be a genuine human sexual orientation.<ref>Animal Lovers: Zoophiles Make Scientists Rethink Human Sexuality By Jesse Bering, March 24, 2010</ref>}}

Concerning the aberrant practice of [[homosexuality]], the licentious [[liberal]] community [[Views on Homosexuality|has more favorable views]] on [[homosexuality]] than [[conservative]]s plus has a history of inflating the number of people who are homosexuals.<ref>[http://www.cwfa.org/content.asp?id=2099 How Bad Science Helped Launch the 'Gay' Revolution] By Robert H. Knight</ref> In addition, liberals [[Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality|are more likely to believe]] in evolutionary pseudoscience.  Thus, it is not surprising the ''Scientific American'' engaged in the above cited speculation.

Concerning the aberrant practice of [[homosexuality]], the licentious [[liberal]] community [[Views on Homosexuality|has more favorable views]] on [[homosexuality]] than [[conservative]]s plus has a history of inflating the number of people who are homosexuals.<ref>[http://www.cwfa.org/content.asp?id=2099 How Bad Science Helped Launch the 'Gay' Revolution] By Robert H. Knight</ref> In addition, liberals [[Evolution, Liberalism, Atheism, and Irrationality|are more likely to believe]] in evolutionary pseudoscience.  Thus, it is not surprising the ''Scientific American'' engaged in the above cited speculation.

==External Links==

==External links==

[http://sciam.com/ Scientific American]

* [http://sciam.com/ Scientific American]

==References==

==References==