1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 210:
Line 210: + +
→Historical/Cultural Bias: The article on Capital punishment does cite biblical law
:::So why not apply Biblical law in the article on Capital Punishment instead of segregating it into a separate section? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 12:28, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
:::So why not apply Biblical law in the article on Capital Punishment instead of segregating it into a separate section? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 12:28, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
:::: The article on [[Capital punishment]] does cite biblical law. I don't think that a separate section for adultery punishment is needed, as there isn't much to say. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:47, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
:It should be defined as a breach of faith, in whatever context, marital or spiritual. The scripture is probably the best source for this. A discussion of penalties, then and now, is really a different matter, and could go under a seperate subhead. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
:It should be defined as a breach of faith, in whatever context, marital or spiritual. The scripture is probably the best source for this. A discussion of penalties, then and now, is really a different matter, and could go under a seperate subhead. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT)