| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| | After quashing a major rebellion later in the year, things seemed to settle down, with a compliant parliament in 1484 and a series of statutes that, whilst strengthening Richard’s hold on power, were also of benefit to the realm. His powerful army kept the [[barons]] in check. However, his enemies’ whispering campaign about his possible direct involvement in the disappearance (murder?) of the “princes in the Tower” (and even rumours that he personally executed the young son of Henry VI after the battle of Tewkesbury, and did to death Henry himself in the Tower, a few weeks later) began to wear away at his popularity. | | After quashing a major rebellion later in the year, things seemed to settle down, with a compliant parliament in 1484 and a series of statutes that, whilst strengthening Richard’s hold on power, were also of benefit to the realm. His powerful army kept the [[barons]] in check. However, his enemies’ whispering campaign about his possible direct involvement in the disappearance (murder?) of the “princes in the Tower” (and even rumours that he personally executed the young son of Henry VI after the battle of Tewkesbury, and did to death Henry himself in the Tower, a few weeks later) began to wear away at his popularity. |
| | | | |
| − | Focus for his overthrow centred on the exiled Henry [[Tudor]], Earl of [[Richmond]], whose claim to the throne was shaky at best, but had the backing of the [[Welsh]], growing support in England, and was possessed of qualities of leadership and political skills that would see his prevail now and in the future. Henry landed in Wales on 7th of August 1485. The two sides met at [[Battle of Bosworth|Bosworth Field]] in [[Leicestershire]] on 22nd of August, and, although enjoying initial superiority in numbers, the decision of a key supporter to change sides in mid-battle gave the advantage to Henry and Richard died leading an assault on Henry’s position. His death ended the [[Plantagenet]] dynasty. Henry assumed the throne as the [[Tudor Dynasty|Tudor]] [[Henry VII]]. | + | Focus for his overthrow centred on the exiled Henry [[Tudor]], Earl of [[Richmond]], whose claim to the throne was shaky at best, but had the backing of the [[Welsh]], growing support in England, and was possessed of qualities of leadership and political skills that would see his prevail now and in the future. Henry landed in Wales on 7 August 1485. The two sides met at [[Battle of Bosworth|Bosworth Field]] in [[Leicestershire]] on 22 August, and, although enjoying initial superiority in numbers, the decision of a key supporter to change sides in mid-battle gave the advantage to Henry and Richard died leading an assault on Henry’s position. His death ended the [[Plantagenet]] dynasty. Henry assumed the throne as the [[Tudor Dynasty|Tudor]] [[Henry VII]]. |
| | | | |
| | Much of posterity has not been kind to Richard III. The Tudor propaganda machine, already active during his short reign was relentless in depicting him as a murderous and misshapen villain. This was to culminate in [[Shakespeare]]’s depiction of him, over 120 years after his death, as the evil hunchback. (Contemporary accounts describe him as slight and not particularly tall with one shoulder higher than the other, but there is no mention of deformity.) There can be no doubt of his ruthlessness, but taken within the context of the age, the executions of Earl Rivers and others he considered dangerous to his cause are not out of the ordinary. There is no evidence that he ordered the deaths of the [[Edward V|Princes in the Tower]], although it must be considered as a possibility. The earlier death of Henry VI, even if he can be blamed (and there is no evidence at all for his involvement) has a precedent in the usurpation and murder of [[Richard II]] in 1400, events that paved the way in the minds of men for subsequent villainy. | | Much of posterity has not been kind to Richard III. The Tudor propaganda machine, already active during his short reign was relentless in depicting him as a murderous and misshapen villain. This was to culminate in [[Shakespeare]]’s depiction of him, over 120 years after his death, as the evil hunchback. (Contemporary accounts describe him as slight and not particularly tall with one shoulder higher than the other, but there is no mention of deformity.) There can be no doubt of his ruthlessness, but taken within the context of the age, the executions of Earl Rivers and others he considered dangerous to his cause are not out of the ordinary. There is no evidence that he ordered the deaths of the [[Edward V|Princes in the Tower]], although it must be considered as a possibility. The earlier death of Henry VI, even if he can be blamed (and there is no evidence at all for his involvement) has a precedent in the usurpation and murder of [[Richard II]] in 1400, events that paved the way in the minds of men for subsequent villainy. |
| Line 21: |
Line 21: |
| | | | |
| | ==Confirmation== | | ==Confirmation== |
| − | 4th February 2013 - Tests have confirmed that the body found below the site of the Grey Friars Abbey in Leicester are those of Richard III. Detailed analysis has shown that the DNA taken in September matched that of Michael Ibsen, a Canadian-born London furniture maker who is almost certainly a direct descendent of Anne of York, Richard’s sister.
| + | 4 February 2013 - Tests have confirmed that the body found below the site of the Grey Friars Abbey in Leicester are those of Richard III. Detailed analysis has shown that the DNA taken in September matched that of Michael Ibsen, a Canadian-born London furniture maker who is almost certainly a direct descendent of Anne of York, Richard’s sister. |
| | | | |
| | These tests and detailed analysis of the bones which not only show the cause of death ( a blow into the brain from a halberd, a sort of long-handled axe) but confirmed accounts of mutilation of his body. Lead archaeologist Richard Buckley said his team is convinced “beyond reasonable doubt.” | | These tests and detailed analysis of the bones which not only show the cause of death ( a blow into the brain from a halberd, a sort of long-handled axe) but confirmed accounts of mutilation of his body. Lead archaeologist Richard Buckley said his team is convinced “beyond reasonable doubt.” |
| Line 33: |
Line 33: |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | [[Category: English History]] | + | [[Category:English History]] |
| − | [[Category: Medieval History]] | + | [[Category:Medieval History]] |
| − | [[Category: Wars of the Roses]] | + | [[Category:Wars of the Roses]] |
| | | | |
| | {{DEFAULTSORT:Richard 3}} | | {{DEFAULTSORT:Richard 3}} |
| | {{Nb_english_monarchs}} | | {{Nb_english_monarchs}} |