Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2 bytes added ,  03:41, June 27, 2016
clean up
Line 9: Line 9:  
In his own day, Ramsay was better known as a historian and author than as a politician.  In 1785 he published in two volumes ''History of the Revolution of South Carolina'', in 1789 in two volumes ''History of the American Revolution'', in [[1807]] a ''Life of Washington'', and in 1809 in two volumes a ''History of South Carolina''. Ramsay was also the author of several minor works, including a memoir (1812) of his third wife Martha Laurens Ramsay, a well-educated woman who had served as a political hostess for her father, [[Henry Laurens]], during the 1780s.
 
In his own day, Ramsay was better known as a historian and author than as a politician.  In 1785 he published in two volumes ''History of the Revolution of South Carolina'', in 1789 in two volumes ''History of the American Revolution'', in [[1807]] a ''Life of Washington'', and in 1809 in two volumes a ''History of South Carolina''. Ramsay was also the author of several minor works, including a memoir (1812) of his third wife Martha Laurens Ramsay, a well-educated woman who had served as a political hostess for her father, [[Henry Laurens]], during the 1780s.
   −
Messer (2002) examines the transition in Ramsay's republican perspective from his ''History of the American Revolution'' (1789) to his more conservative ''History of the United States'' (1816-17). His works went from a call for active citizens to reform and improve societal institutions to a warning of the dangers of an overzealous population and the need to preserve existing institutions. In his discussion of the treatment of Indians and African American slaves he became less critical of whites and changed to reflect the views of society at large. Ramsay's increasing involvement in South Carolina's economic and political institutions and the need for stability that defined early-19th-century nationalism influenced this transformation. O'Brien (1994) argues his 1789 ''History of the American Revolution'' was one of the first and most accomplished histories to appear in the aftermath of that event. She says it challenges American exceptionalist literary frameworks by presenting itself within the European Enlightenment historical tradition, reflecting Ramsay's belief that the United States would have no historical destiny beyond typical patterns of European political and cultural development. Epic portrayals of American history in the 19th century were more the product of New England's historiographic traditions coupled with German historical thought, treating national character as a historical agent, rather than a historical result, as Ramsay suggests. Ramsay's history, then, is better considered the last of the European Enlightenment tradition than the first of American historical epics. Ramsay's ''History of South Carolina: From Its First Settlement in 1670 to the Year 1808'' was a pioneer in state history, providing much more sophisticated analysis that was usual.
+
Messer (2002) examines the transition in Ramsay's republican perspective from his ''History of the American Revolution'' (1789) to his more conservative ''History of the United States'' (1816–17). His works went from a call for active citizens to reform and improve societal institutions to a warning of the dangers of an overzealous population and the need to preserve existing institutions. In his discussion of the treatment of Indians and African American slaves he became less critical of whites and changed to reflect the views of society at large. Ramsay's increasing involvement in South Carolina's economic and political institutions and the need for stability that defined early-19th-century nationalism influenced this transformation. O'Brien (1994) argues his 1789 ''History of the American Revolution'' was one of the first and most accomplished histories to appear in the aftermath of that event. She says it challenges American exceptionalist literary frameworks by presenting itself within the European Enlightenment historical tradition, reflecting Ramsay's belief that the United States would have no historical destiny beyond typical patterns of European political and cultural development. Epic portrayals of American history in the 19th century were more the product of New England's historiographic traditions coupled with German historical thought, treating national character as a historical agent, rather than a historical result, as Ramsay suggests. Ramsay's history, then, is better considered the last of the European Enlightenment tradition than the first of American historical epics. Ramsay's ''History of South Carolina: From Its First Settlement in 1670 to the Year 1808'' was a pioneer in state history, providing much more sophisticated analysis that was usual.
    
His ''History of the United States'' in three volumes was published posthumously in 1816–1817, and forms the first three volumes of his ''Universal History Americanized'', published in twelve volumes in 1819.
 
His ''History of the United States'' in three volumes was published posthumously in 1816–1817, and forms the first three volumes of his ''Universal History Americanized'', published in twelve volumes in 1819.
Line 32: Line 32:  
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
* [http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=R000023 Biographic sketch at U.S. Congress website]
 
* [http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=R000023 Biographic sketch at U.S. Congress website]
−
====references====
+
====References====
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,666

edits

Navigation menu