Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, Bots, edit
57,719
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: − + − +
→top: clean up & uniformity
The Supreme Court of [[Minnesota]] had held that the officer's viewing was a search that violated respondents' [[Fourth Amendment]] rights. Chief Justice [[William Rehnquist]], writing for a 6-3 Court, found that no violation had occurred and reversed the decision of the state court.
The Supreme Court of [[Minnesota]] had held that the officer's viewing was a search that violated respondents' [[Fourth Amendment]] rights. Chief Justice [[William Rehnquist]], writing for a 6-3 Court, found that no violation had occurred and reversed the decision of the state court.
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:Fourth Amendment]]
[[Category:Fourth Amendment]]