Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎See also: clean up & uniformity
Line 44: Line 44:  
The constitutionality of the Controlled Substance Act has been disputed. In 1972, the [[National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse]], commissioned by President [[Richard Nixon]], reported questioned whether the Act has violated various constitutional limitation on federal power. Nixon and the Congress ignored the committee's findings and the Act was implemented anyways. In 2005, the Supreme Court decided in case ''[[Gonzales v. Raich]]'', in a 6-3 decision that the Controlled Substance Act did not violate the [[Commerce Clause]] in [[United States Constitution]]. The decision cited ''[[Wickard v. Filburn]]'', an FDR-era case that significantly expanded federal power over intrastate commerce.
 
The constitutionality of the Controlled Substance Act has been disputed. In 1972, the [[National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse]], commissioned by President [[Richard Nixon]], reported questioned whether the Act has violated various constitutional limitation on federal power. Nixon and the Congress ignored the committee's findings and the Act was implemented anyways. In 2005, the Supreme Court decided in case ''[[Gonzales v. Raich]]'', in a 6-3 decision that the Controlled Substance Act did not violate the [[Commerce Clause]] in [[United States Constitution]]. The decision cited ''[[Wickard v. Filburn]]'', an FDR-era case that significantly expanded federal power over intrastate commerce.
   −
== See Also ==
+
== See also ==
 
* [[Alcoholism]]-[[Alcohol abuse]]: Addiction to [[Alcoholic beverages]]-[[Alcohol consumption]]
 
* [[Alcoholism]]-[[Alcohol abuse]]: Addiction to [[Alcoholic beverages]]-[[Alcohol consumption]]
 
* [[Cigarette]]-[[Tobacco]]-[[Nicotine]] addiction
 
* [[Cigarette]]-[[Tobacco]]-[[Nicotine]] addiction
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,183

edits

Navigation menu