37
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + + + +
no edit summary
:Carbon-14 dating is based on the presumption that Biblical history is wrong (it assumes no Flood, therefore assumes not effect on the C14 balance in the atmosphere from the Flood), so cannot be used to disprove the Flood, as the argument assumes what it attempts to prove. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:00, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
:Carbon-14 dating is based on the presumption that Biblical history is wrong (it assumes no Flood, therefore assumes not effect on the C14 balance in the atmosphere from the Flood), so cannot be used to disprove the Flood, as the argument assumes what it attempts to prove. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:00, 21 April 2007 (EDT)
'''My point'''
I'm not disproving the flood, i saw a good doccumentary explaining it, And the C14 test is based on the level of decay of the Carbon, not on the quantity, but Earth cannot be stable in 6000 years, it's still pretty active geoloically. And that god didn't mentioned the BIG BANG doesn't mean it didn't existed, it means that it was't god's point, God didn't talked about polar bears, atoms, superstring theory and Dolphins, yet they exist, if god wanted to metion every friggin' thing that exists in the universe, the bible wouldn't be finished by now, and the most important: we wouldn't need to do all that helluva effort to arrive here, to nuclear fission, flight and modern medical cures, it would have been just plain easy to just say "God said that, now STFU" and just relax, but God gave us a "starting point": The Bible. It gave us that book saying "the rest is up to you", and he did great. We started questioning the universe and developing new technologies to understand it, some of them were used wisely, some not, but at the end we are here :D [[User:Schwarze|Schwarze]] 20:26, 23 April 2007 (EDT)
BTW:Where the heck does the bible mention the age of earth? [[User:Schwarze|Schwarze]] 20:26, 23 April 2007 (EDT)