| Line 218: |
Line 218: |
| | | | |
| | ===Contradiction=== | | ===Contradiction=== |
| − | :''Main article: [[Contradiction]]''
| + | {{Main|Contradiction}} |
| | | | |
| | A contradiction is a statement that contradicts its own terms. [[Aristotle]] famously stated that contradictions cannot exist. In any case of a contradiction, some of the premises must be false. A contradiction is an argument which includes in its reasoning: | | A contradiction is a statement that contradicts its own terms. [[Aristotle]] famously stated that contradictions cannot exist. In any case of a contradiction, some of the premises must be false. A contradiction is an argument which includes in its reasoning: |
| Line 240: |
Line 240: |
| | | | |
| | ====Circular reasoning==== | | ====Circular reasoning==== |
| − | :''Main article: [[Circular reasoning]]''
| + | {{Main|Circular reasoning}} |
| | | | |
| | [[Circular reasoning]], also called begging the question (Lat: petitio principii), is a form of proof by assertion in which one asserts a premise, then asserts a conclusion from that premise (directly or indirectly), and then tries to show that the last conclusion ''supports'' the original premise. | | [[Circular reasoning]], also called begging the question (Lat: petitio principii), is a form of proof by assertion in which one asserts a premise, then asserts a conclusion from that premise (directly or indirectly), and then tries to show that the last conclusion ''supports'' the original premise. |
| Line 279: |
Line 279: |
| | | | |
| | ===Straw man=== | | ===Straw man=== |
| − | :''Main article: [[Straw man fallacy]]
| + | {{Main|Straw man fallacy}} |
| | | | |
| | A straw man fallacy occurs by first incorrectly attributing an argument to someone, disproving this argument, then claiming that the person was wrong. A straw man argument follows the form: | | A straw man fallacy occurs by first incorrectly attributing an argument to someone, disproving this argument, then claiming that the person was wrong. A straw man argument follows the form: |
| Line 295: |
Line 295: |
| | | | |
| | ===Tautology=== | | ===Tautology=== |
| − | :''Main article: [[tautology]]''
| + | {{Main|tautology}} |
| | | | |
| | A [[tautology]] ([[Greek]] '''ταυτο-''' ''tauto-'', "the same") is an argument that becomes a repetition of a definition. Literally it means "the study of the same." Such an argument, or statement, can prove nothing beyond itself and is useless as a premise. | | A [[tautology]] ([[Greek]] '''ταυτο-''' ''tauto-'', "the same") is an argument that becomes a repetition of a definition. Literally it means "the study of the same." Such an argument, or statement, can prove nothing beyond itself and is useless as a premise. |
| Line 335: |
Line 335: |
| | <references/> | | <references/> |
| | | | |
| − | ==See Also== | + | ==See also== |
| | | | |
| | * [[Atheism and logical fallacies]] | | * [[Atheism and logical fallacies]] |
| Line 345: |
Line 345: |
| | * [[Debate:Is infinite regression ever valid as a form of reasoning, or acceptable as a way the universe works, or came to be?]] | | * [[Debate:Is infinite regression ever valid as a form of reasoning, or acceptable as a way the universe works, or came to be?]] |
| | | | |
| − | ==External Links== | + | ==External links== |
| | *[http://creationwiki.org/Logical_fallacy Logical fallacy] by [[CreationWiki]] | | *[http://creationwiki.org/Logical_fallacy Logical fallacy] by [[CreationWiki]] |
| | *[http://www.creationsafaris.com/crevbd.htm The Baloney Detector] | | *[http://www.creationsafaris.com/crevbd.htm The Baloney Detector] |
| | *[http://www.theskepticsguide.org/logicalfallacies.asp SGU-Top 20 Fallacies] | | *[http://www.theskepticsguide.org/logicalfallacies.asp SGU-Top 20 Fallacies] |
| − | * Sagan, Carl. "The Fine Art of Baloney Detection" in ''The Demon-Haunted World, Science As a Candle in the Dark';' Ballantine: New York, pp. 201-218 (1996) | + | * Sagan, Carl. "The Fine Art of Baloney Detection" in ''The Demon-Haunted World, Science As a Candle in the Dark';' Ballantine: New York, pp. 201–218 (1996) |
| | | | |
| | {{Liberalism}} | | {{Liberalism}} |
| | [[Category:Logic]] | | [[Category:Logic]] |
| | [[Category:Logical Fallacies| ]] | | [[Category:Logical Fallacies| ]] |