| Line 127: |
Line 127: |
| | |1980 | | |1980 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Comedy musical. A story of redemption, "A mission from God", raising money to save a Catholic orphanage. R-rated movie for vulgar language, slap stick comedy. Vatican approved. <ref>[http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/06/18/vatican-blesses-blues-brothers/ Vatican Calls The Blues Brothers “Catholic”, FOXNews, June 19, 2010]</ref> | + | |Comedy musical. A story of redemption, "A mission from God", raising money to save a Catholic orphanage. R-rated movie for vulgar language, slap stick comedy. Vatican approved.<ref>[http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/06/18/vatican-blesses-blues-brothers/ Vatican Calls The Blues Brothers “Catholic”, FOXNews, June 19, 2010]</ref> |
| | |$57,229,890 | | |$57,229,890 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 169: |
Line 169: |
| | |1981 | | |1981 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |Stories of devout Scottish Christian [[Eric Liddell]] who wants to run for the glory of God and Jewish [[Harold Abrahams]], struggling to overcome prejudice in 1924 Britain. That year's Olmypics Games was especially spiritual when Liddell refused the Prince of Wales' request that he perform his competition on a Sunday. | + | |Stories of devout Scottish Christian [[Eric Liddell]] who wants to run for the glory of God and Jewish [[Harold Abrahams]], struggling to overcome prejudice in 1924 Britain. That year's Olympics Games was especially spiritual when Liddell refused the Prince of Wales' request that he perform his competition on a Sunday. |
| | |$58,972,904 | | |$58,972,904 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 182: |
Line 182: |
| | |R | | |R |
| | |A thriller about the deceit surrounding water rights in southern California and L.A.'s water system, removing most of the water from the central valley. Sequel: ''The Two Jakes'' (1990) | | |A thriller about the deceit surrounding water rights in southern California and L.A.'s water system, removing most of the water from the central valley. Sequel: ''The Two Jakes'' (1990) |
| − | |$30,000,000 (world wide estimate) | + | |$30,000,000 (worldwide estimate) |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''Chitty Chitty Bang Bang'' | | |''Chitty Chitty Bang Bang'' |
| Line 513: |
Line 513: |
| | |R | | |R |
| | |A look into the life of an American bomb disposal regiment in Iraq risking their lives for their country and for the innocent by confronting evil. Rated R for violence and language. | | |A look into the life of an American bomb disposal regiment in Iraq risking their lives for their country and for the innocent by confronting evil. Rated R for violence and language. |
| − | |$ 12,647,089 | + | |$12,647,089 |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''I Am David'' | | |''I Am David'' |
| Line 600: |
Line 600: |
| | |1989 | | |1989 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |A true story about combating drug use, violence, and contempt for authority while exalting positive values like academic achievement and family values. Biodrama about Paterson, New Jersey's real life [[Joe Clark]]. <ref>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097722/</ref> | + | |A true story about combating drug use, violence, and contempt for authority while exalting positive values like academic achievement and family values. Biodrama about Paterson, New Jersey's real life [[Joe Clark]].<ref>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097722/</ref> |
| | |$31,906,454 | | |$31,906,454 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 702: |
Line 702: |
| | |1974 Italy-U.K. | | |1974 Italy-U.K. |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |Italian-British-American production which features [[Burt Lancaster]] playing [[Moses]] the lawgiver. Less flamboyant than Cecil B. Demille's movie ''[[The Ten Commandments (film, 1956)|The Ten Commandments]]'' and focuses more on the Biblical figure of Moses. Originally a six-part U.S. TV mini-series in 1975, but edited to make it a U.S. movie in 1976. | + | |Italian-British-American production which features [[Burt Lancaster]] playing [[Moses]] the lawgiver. Less flamboyant than Cecil B. DeMille's movie ''[[The Ten Commandments (film, 1956)|The Ten Commandments]]'' and focuses more on the Biblical figure of Moses. Originally a six-part U.S. TV mini-series in 1975, but edited to make it a U.S. movie in 1976. |
| | |unknown money returns | | |unknown money returns |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 783: |
Line 783: |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| | |Acceptance of God's calling is rewarded, the faithful are vindicated, and naysayers are proven wrong. Had two sequels in 1980 and 1984. | | |Acceptance of God's calling is rewarded, the faithful are vindicated, and naysayers are proven wrong. Had two sequels in 1980 and 1984. |
| − | |$ 41,687,243 | + | |$41,687,243 |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''[[On The Waterfront]]'' | | |''[[On The Waterfront]]'' |
| Line 837: |
Line 837: |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| | |An animated telling of the life of [[Moses]]. | | |An animated telling of the life of [[Moses]]. |
| − | |$ 101,217,900 | + | |$101,217,900 |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''[[The Pursuit of Happyness]]'' | | |''[[The Pursuit of Happyness]]'' |
| | |2006 | | |2006 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| − | |A film that shows hard work, dedication, loyalty and trust can result in success and "happiness" for any American, regardless of race, gender or creed. It is an instructional piece about the tradition of "stick-to-it-iveness" that has made America a land of hope and opportunity for so many. This film’s main themes -- the primacy of the family, the blessings of free and open markets, the necessity of staying true to one’s ideals -- are all conservative concepts. | + | |A film that shows hard work, dedication, loyalty and trust can result in success and "happiness" for any American, regardless of race, gender or creed. It is an instructional piece about the tradition of "stick-to-it-iveness" that has made America a land of hope and opportunity for so many. This film’s main themes—the primacy of the family, the blessings of free and open markets, the necessity of staying true to one’s ideals—are all conservative concepts. |
| | |$307,077,300 | | |$307,077,300 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 914: |
Line 914: |
| | |1993 | | |1993 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | | Tells the story Oskar Schindler, a christian businessman who saved the lives of more than a thousand Jewish refugees during the Holocaust by employing them in his factories. The film also shows the danger of [[gun control]] as German citizens are shown being shot by their Nazi oppressors without any way of fighting back. | + | | Tells the story Oskar Schindler, a Christian businessman who saved the lives of more than a thousand Jewish refugees during the Holocaust by employing them in his factories. The film also shows the danger of [[gun control]] as German citizens are shown being shot by their Nazi oppressors without any way of fighting back. |
| | |$96,065,768 | | |$96,065,768 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 933: |
Line 933: |
| | |R | | |R |
| | |Starring Demi Moore, a fictional account of the return of Jesus to usher in the apocalypse and judge mankind. Catholic themed movie has Demi offering her life for the souls of others. | | |Starring Demi Moore, a fictional account of the return of Jesus to usher in the apocalypse and judge mankind. Catholic themed movie has Demi offering her life for the souls of others. |
| − | |$ 18,875,011 | + | |$18,875,011 |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''Sexmission'' | | |''Sexmission'' |
| Line 1,023: |
Line 1,023: |
| | |UR | | |UR |
| | |A thrilling movie about the heroics of fighter pilots during [[World War II]]; used as an educational film for management training seminars. | | |A thrilling movie about the heroics of fighter pilots during [[World War II]]; used as an educational film for management training seminars. |
| − | |$ 3,225,000 | + | |$3,225,000 |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''Uncle Buck'' | | |''Uncle Buck'' |
| Line 1,032: |
Line 1,032: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''[[Veggie Tales]]'' | | |''[[Veggie Tales]]'' |
| − | |1993-Present | + | |1993–Present |
| | |TV-Y | | |TV-Y |
| | |The adventures of anthropomorphic vegetables, where the stories are all based upon moral themes based on Christianity. | | |The adventures of anthropomorphic vegetables, where the stories are all based upon moral themes based on Christianity. |
| Line 1,113: |
Line 1,113: |
| | |2008 | | |2008 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |[[Ben Stein]] exposes [[evolution|evolutionists]]' scientific and education system [[deceit]]. | + | |[[Ben Stein]] exposes [[evolution]]ists' scientific and education system [[deceit]]. |
| | |$7,690,545 | | |$7,690,545 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,143: |
Line 1,143: |
| | |2007 | | |2007 |
| | |UR | | |UR |
| − | |Exposed political correctness, racial and ethnic politics in the academic setting. <ref>[http://video.yahoo.com/watch/3624795/9994231 Indoctrinate U -Part 1/3, Yahoo]</ref> | + | |Exposed political correctness, racial and ethnic politics in the academic setting.<ref>[http://video.yahoo.com/watch/3624795/9994231 Indoctrinate U -Part 1/3, Yahoo]</ref> |
| | |Unknown | | |Unknown |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,149: |
Line 1,149: |
| | |2011 | | |2011 |
| | |UR | | |UR |
| − | |How the teachers' unions are destroying our public schools. <ref>[http://www.kidsarentcars.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/KACOneSheet.pdf KAC Summary]</ref> | + | |How the teachers' unions are destroying our public schools.<ref>[http://www.kidsarentcars.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/KACOneSheet.pdf KAC Summary]</ref> |
| | |Unknown | | |Unknown |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,155: |
Line 1,155: |
| | |2009 | | |2009 |
| | |UR | | |UR |
| − | |This film explores the inception of [[Planned Parenthood]] as an organization created to exterminate African-Americans. It exposes the words of its racist founder [[Margaret Sanger]] and their impact on black genocide more than a century later. <ref>[http://www.maafa21.com www.maafa21.com]</ref> | + | |This film explores the inception of [[Planned Parenthood]] as an organization created to exterminate African-Americans. It exposes the words of its racist founder [[Margaret Sanger]] and their impact on black genocide more than a century later.<ref>[http://www.maafa21.com www.maafa21.com]</ref> |
| | |NA - DVD | | |NA - DVD |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,319: |
Line 1,319: |
| | |2007 | | |2007 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Unemployed, immature and childish 23-year old Ben Stone (Seth Rogen) has a one night stand with serious career woman Alison Scott (Katherine Heigl), with the unintended consequence of pregnancy. Alison's mother (Joanna Kerns) says she should get the pregnancy "[[abortion|taken care of]]", while Ben's best friend Jonah (Jonah Hill) suggests that "I won't say the A-word, but it rhymes with abortion." Alison decides to keep the child, while Ben decides to find a real job, grow up, and become a father. | + | |Unemployed, immature and childish 23-year old Ben Stone (Seth Rogen) has a one-night stand with serious career woman Alison Scott (Katherine Heigl), with the unintended consequence of pregnancy. Alison's mother (Joanna Kerns) says she should get the pregnancy "[[abortion|taken care of]]", while Ben's best friend Jonah (Jonah Hill) suggests that "I won't say the A-word, but it rhymes with abortion." Alison decides to keep the child, while Ben decides to find a real job, grow up, and become a father. |
| | |$148,768,917 | | |$148,768,917 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,325: |
Line 1,325: |
| | |1991 | | |1991 |
| | |G | | |G |
| − | |A young woman overcomes a shallow society and finds true love. Although by comparison a powerful and immensely popular antidote to [[feminism]] to the [[liberal]] movies churned out by [[Disney]] since, as well as overall promoting redemption (as seen with the Beast's transformation), and also promoting some family values (such as Belle being loyal to her father), there were a few hints at feminist propaganda at the beginning of the film, such as Belle being different from the villagers because she can read, which is implied to not be supported by the villagers at all (feminist propaganda often falsely claims that women couldn't get an education until the 1960s), as well as Belle being unwilling to hold the role of housewife for Gaston or raising children. Then-Disney Chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg also mentioned that he wanted "a feminist twist" on the original fairy tale by creating a heroine who is "a departure from typical Disney female characters",<ref>http://articles.mcall.com/1991-11-22/features/2825583_1_beast-s-castle-fairy-tale-madame-gabrielle</ref> and Linda Woolverton made clear that she made Belle a feminist and based her on the women's liberation movement in order to avoid creating another insipid princess.<ref name="Beauty and Maleficent">{{Cite web|url = http://time.com/2798136/maleficent-beauty-beast-writer/|title = The Same Woman Wrote Maleficent and Beauty and the Beast—Here’s How They’re Linked|date = May 30, 2014|accessdate = January 16, 2014|website = Time|publisher = |last = Rothman|first = Lily}}</ref> Gaston is a conservative and hardworking hunter who is considered by the villagers to be their town hero, but is shown to be the main villain of the movie (it should also be noted that in the original screenplay for the film, Gaston was intended to be a Marquess [French nobleman], meaning the decision to make him a conservative and hardworking hunter was made after a rewrite). In addition, the villagers (strongly implied to be practicing and devout Christians) were later briefly seen supporting a plan that went against God's teachings. In addition, Belle's love for Beast (where it is implied that she was largely unaware of the Beast being formerly a human prince) could be seen as promoting bestiality. Also, it is the first Disney movie to neither show nor hint at the two love interests getting married, and in fact, the only "wedding" in the film was the one Belle ruined, creating negative implications about marriage as a result, as well as starting a string of movies that don't paint marriage in a positive light. Similarly, the only three females in the film who are implicitly supportive of marriage and Christianity are demeaned, depicted as dumb blondes with the script and credits explicitly referring to them derogatorily as "the bimbettes." There were also several overtones of a pro-homosexual agenda within the film, including the mob song late into the film, largely because of the executive producer, Howard Ashman, being gay and dying from AIDs at the time the film was made. One of the protagonistic characters, Lumiere, is briefly seen making out with a featherduster and was implied that the two weren't married, with some hints at Lumiere being a unrepentant womanizer. In addition, some elements of the film were later reused in the [[Essay:Worst Liberal Movies#Social|definitely liberal]] ''Maleficent'' movie.<ref name="Beauty and Maleficent" /> | + | |A young woman overcomes a shallow society and finds true love. Although by comparison a powerful and immensely popular antidote to [[feminism]] to the [[liberal]] movies churned out by [[Disney]] since, as well as overall promoting redemption (as seen with the Beast's transformation), and also promoting some family values (such as Belle being loyal to her father), there were a few hints at feminist propaganda at the beginning of the film, such as Belle being different from the villagers because she can read, which is implied to not be supported by the villagers at all (feminist propaganda often falsely claims that women couldn't get an education until the 1960s), as well as Belle being unwilling to hold the role of housewife for Gaston or raising children. Then-Disney Chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg also mentioned that he wanted "a feminist twist" on the original fairy tale by creating a heroine who is "a departure from typical Disney female characters",<ref>http://articles.mcall.com/1991-11-22/features/2825583_1_beast-s-castle-fairy-tale-madame-gabrielle</ref> and Linda Woolverton made clear that she made Belle a feminist and based her on the women's liberation movement in order to avoid creating another insipid princess.<ref name="Beauty and Maleficent">{{Cite web|url = http://time.com/2798136/maleficent-beauty-beast-writer/|title = The Same Woman Wrote Maleficent and Beauty and the Beast—Here’s How They’re Linked|date = May 30, 2014|accessdate = January 16, 2014|website = Time|publisher = |last = Rothman|first = Lily}}</ref> Gaston is a conservative and hardworking hunter who is considered by the villagers to be their town hero, but is shown to be the main villain of the movie (it should also be noted that in the original screenplay for the film, Gaston was intended to be a Marquess [French nobleman], meaning the decision to make him a conservative and hardworking hunter was made after a rewrite). In addition, the villagers (strongly implied to be practicing and devout Christians) were later briefly seen supporting a plan that went against God's teachings. In addition, Belle's love for Beast (where it is implied that she was largely unaware of the Beast being formerly a human prince) could be seen as promoting bestiality. Also, it is the first Disney movie to neither show nor hint at the two love interests getting married, and in fact, the only "wedding" in the film was the one Belle ruined, creating negative implications about marriage as a result, as well as starting a string of movies that don't paint marriage in a positive light. Similarly, the only three females in the film who are implicitly supportive of marriage and Christianity are demeaned, depicted as dumb blondes with the script and credits explicitly referring to them derogatorily as "the bimbettes." There were also several overtones of a pro-homosexual agenda within the film, including the mob song late into the film, largely because of the executive producer, Howard Ashman, being gay and dying from AIDs at the time the film was made. One of the protagonistic characters, Lumiere, is briefly seen making out with a featherduster and was implied that the two weren't married, with some hints at Lumiere being an unrepentant womanizer. In addition, some elements of the film were later reused in the [[Essay:Worst Liberal Movies#Social|definitely liberal]] ''Maleficent'' movie.<ref name="Beauty and Maleficent" /> |
| − | |$ 25,487,028 | + | |$25,487,028 |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''[[Titanic]]'' | | |''[[Titanic]]'' |
| Line 1,361: |
Line 1,361: |
| | |2015 | | |2015 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |Anti-enviromentalist, the villain attempts to eradicate the human race because of his belief in man-made global warming. Though the film is full of language and violence as well as a brief nudity scene. | + | |Anti-environmentalist, the villain attempts to eradicate the human race because of his belief in man-made global warming. Though the film is full of language and violence as well as a brief nudity scene. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |