Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 332: Line 332:  
:And technically, Star Wars isn't "sci-fi", it's "space fantasy," so the bit about there lacking a god or supernatural elements won't apply.
 
:And technically, Star Wars isn't "sci-fi", it's "space fantasy," so the bit about there lacking a god or supernatural elements won't apply.
 
:I do agree that it's status as a conservative film is debatable, though. Heck, the heroes were explicitly derived from the Vietcong in the original trilogy, which alongside the Empire being explicitly based on America during that time period would alone destroy any ideas of it being conservative. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 09:26, 27 June 2016 (EDT)
 
:I do agree that it's status as a conservative film is debatable, though. Heck, the heroes were explicitly derived from the Vietcong in the original trilogy, which alongside the Empire being explicitly based on America during that time period would alone destroy any ideas of it being conservative. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 09:26, 27 June 2016 (EDT)
 +
:EDIT: BTW, think you can comment on my topic regarding whether Beauty and the Beast can truly be considered even debatably a conservative film, let alone one of the greatest conservative films? [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 09:29, 27 June 2016 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
5,230

edits

Navigation menu