Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  15:17, June 27, 2016
→‎Later developments since Linnaeus: Cleanup and Spell Check, typos fixed: concensus → consensus, unneccesary → unnecessary, seperate → separate
Line 24: Line 24:  
[[Phylogeny]] directly contradicts the [[Bible]], which quite clearly states,
 
[[Phylogeny]] directly contradicts the [[Bible]], which quite clearly states,
 
{{cquote|'''Genesis 1:25'''<br />And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.}}
 
{{cquote|'''Genesis 1:25'''<br />And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.}}
−
This discredits the theory of [[phylogeny]] by showing that different species of animal had seperate ancestors which were created by [[God]] on the fourth and fifth days of [[Creation]].
+
This discredits the theory of [[phylogeny]] by showing that different species of animal had separate ancestors which were created by [[God]] on the fourth and fifth days of [[Creation]].
    
Evolutionists claim that a weakness of Linnaeus' method was that he could only base his scheme on the structural similarities of the different organisms. However, this was arguably a better approach than making unsubstantiated claims that the different animals had the same ancestor. [[Evolutionist]]s accused Linnaeus of [[polyphyly]], which is the unwarranted inclusion in a taxon of species which did not descend from the same common ancestor. However, since no different species descended from the same common ancestor, it turns out that Linnaeus was right all along.
 
Evolutionists claim that a weakness of Linnaeus' method was that he could only base his scheme on the structural similarities of the different organisms. However, this was arguably a better approach than making unsubstantiated claims that the different animals had the same ancestor. [[Evolutionist]]s accused Linnaeus of [[polyphyly]], which is the unwarranted inclusion in a taxon of species which did not descend from the same common ancestor. However, since no different species descended from the same common ancestor, it turns out that Linnaeus was right all along.
Line 30: Line 30:  
Despite this, [[Evolutionist]]s continue to try and make Linnaeus' [[God]]-given taxonomical divisions conform to the factually unproven and morally dubious claim that different animals come from the same ancestor by haphazardly transplanting the animals from one taxon to another depending on the latest hypothesis about their ancestry, which not only leads to ambiguity over the nomenclature conventions for various species, but is also bound to confuse the animals themselves.
 
Despite this, [[Evolutionist]]s continue to try and make Linnaeus' [[God]]-given taxonomical divisions conform to the factually unproven and morally dubious claim that different animals come from the same ancestor by haphazardly transplanting the animals from one taxon to another depending on the latest hypothesis about their ancestry, which not only leads to ambiguity over the nomenclature conventions for various species, but is also bound to confuse the animals themselves.
   −
Originally, Linnaeus established three kingdoms in his scheme, namely [[Plant]]ae, [[Animal]]ia and an additional group for [[minerals]]. In an unneccesary attempt to alter his theories, early [[Evolutionist]]s made up three new kingdoms and needlessly moved many organisms in and out of them:[[Monera]], for [[prokaryote]]s (i.e., bacteria); [[Protist]]a, for protozoans and most algae; and [[fungus|Fungi]].  More recent [[Evolutionist]]s have invented still more categories, and transplanted more animals into them: [[Bacterium|Bacteria]] and [[Archaea]], which contain the prokaryotes, and [[Eukaryote|Eukaryota]]. These arrangements are constantly being remade and confusingly altered, and are not a clear improvement on Linnaeus' original system, which is still compatible with the Biblical concensus.
+
Originally, Linnaeus established three kingdoms in his scheme, namely [[Plant]]ae, [[Animal]]ia and an additional group for [[minerals]]. In an unnecessary attempt to alter his theories, early [[Evolutionist]]s made up three new kingdoms and needlessly moved many organisms in and out of them:[[Monera]], for [[prokaryote]]s (i.e., bacteria); [[Protist]]a, for protozoans and most algae; and [[fungus|Fungi]].  More recent [[Evolutionist]]s have invented still more categories, and transplanted more animals into them: [[Bacterium|Bacteria]] and [[Archaea]], which contain the prokaryotes, and [[Eukaryote|Eukaryota]]. These arrangements are constantly being remade and confusingly altered, and are not a clear improvement on Linnaeus' original system, which is still compatible with the Biblical consensus.
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, Bots, edit
57,719

edits

Navigation menu